The gap analysis draws from sections 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 of this paper to compare the essential features for a water quality framework with the current situation. Section 6.0 examines actions for going forward.
|
Essential features |
Current framework (from Section 4.0) and existing gaps |
|---|---|
| Roles and relationships
|
Response to and accountability for land use effects on water quality is unclear between some territorial authorities and regional councils. What's missing:
There is patchy engagement with Māori. This has the implication of insufficient consideration being given to the cultural aspects and implications for implementing water management. What's missing:
Partnerships are occurring but only to a limited extent. What's missing:
|
|
Strategic direction |
The national interest in water quality is not well articulated in addressing strategic planning issues (ie, adaptive management, optimising SD outcomes, acknowledgement of trade-offs). What's missing:
The management of land use to sustain water quality has only been addressed to a limited degree in regional planning which has been discretionary. What's missing:
|
|
Consultation |
The state of consultation appears generally acceptable, although there are concerns regarding how much the ideas/feedback from consultation flows through into decision-making. There are also concerns by developers and people being consulted over the costs and time commitments required during consultation. |
|
Information/research/ technology |
Smaller councils have less access to information and research that enables innovation. Innovation is essential to identifying better solutions taking a sustainable development approach. Science and information is incomplete and not widely disseminated. What's missing:
|
| Effective tools
|
There is uncertainty around the legal interpretation of the discharge provisions in the RMA, and their application to diffuse discharges. Most regional councils have not, to date, directly authorised or regulated diffuse discharges or the related land uses. What's missing:
The range of policy tools has not been fully utilised. What's missing:
|
|
Community awareness |
There is insufficient public awareness regarding the impacts of land use on water quality, and where innovative solutions cannot be found trade-offs may be required between priorities. What's missing:
|
| Capacity
|
There is a need for more skilled and, experienced staff and practitioners in water quality management. What's missing:
Some councils are adequately funded to do water quality work, others are not. What's missing:
|