Return to the point in the document where this table is located.
| Indicators | Unhealthy | Healthy | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.Catchment land use |
1 Land and margins grazed |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Appears in an unmodified condition |
|
2.Riverbank condition |
1 Banks eroding |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Banks appear stable |
|
3. River shape [Factors 3 and 20 were removed from the analysis because they could not be rated consistently. Factor 6 was included in the mahinga kai component.] |
1 Shape modified |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Natural shape (pools, riffles, etc) |
|
4.Riparian vegetation |
1 Little or no riparian vegetation |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Complete cover of indigenous margin |
|
5.Indigenous species |
Exotic vegetation visible: |
Indigenous vegetation visible: |
|||
|
1 on adjacent land |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 on adjacent land |
|
|
1 on riparian margins |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 on riparian margins |
|
|
6.Mahinga kai species (birds) |
1 No birds are present |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Range of native birds present |
|
7.Riverbed condition |
1 Mud and sands present |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Cobbles and gravels appear clear |
|
8.Use of the river |
1 Evidence of modification (e.g. stopbanks, straightening, etc) |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Appears unmodified |
|
9.Use of the river |
1 Evidence of takes/discharges |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 No takes or discharges |
|
10.River flow |
1 Cannot see movement |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Movement of water is visible (whitewater and ripples) |
|
11.River flow |
1 Flow cannot be heard |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Noise of the flow is obvious |
|
12.Water quality |
1 Unpleasant odours present |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Clean freshwater smell |
|
13.Water quality |
1 Appears polluted (e.g. foams, oils etc) |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 No pollution evident |
|
14.Water clarity |
1 Water badly discoloured |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Water is clear |
|
15.Sediment |
1 Sediment covering riverbed |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Riverbed free of sediment |
|
16.Use of the riparian margin |
1 Margins grazed |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Margin appears unmodified |
Return to the point in the document where this table is located.