Return to the point in the document where this table is located.
| Indicators | Rating 1-5 |
Comments on the site | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Catchment condition |
1 |
Runanga comments, when they visited the site, were as follows: Safety drinking the water
Fishing at the site
Eating the fish
Balance
Overall health
Access at the site
Harvesting mahinga kai from the site
Final comments
|
|
|
Riverbank condition |
2.6 |
||
|
River shape |
- |
||
|
Riparian vegetation |
2 |
||
|
Indigenous vegetation |
1 |
||
|
Mahinga kai birds |
1.25 |
||
|
Riverbed condition |
1 |
||
|
Use of the river |
1.3 |
||
|
Use of the river |
1.25 |
||
|
Flow visible |
1 |
||
|
Flow heard |
1.25 |
||
|
Odours present / absent |
1.25 |
||
|
Water quality |
1 |
||
|
Water clarity |
1 |
||
|
Sediment present / absent |
1 |
||
|
Use of riparian areas |
1 |
||
|
Safety tasting water |
1 |
||
|
Suitability for fishing |
1 |
||
|
Safety eating fish |
1 |
||
|
Balance between land and water |
1 |
||
|
Abundance of birds |
1.5 |
||
|
Diversity of birds |
1 |
||
|
Abundance of plants |
1.5 |
Species that were harvested in the 19th century include:
Species that were present when the site was surveyed were:
|
|
|
Diversity of plants |
1 |
||
|
Access to the site |
2.75 |
||
|
Suitability for harvesting mahinga kai |
1 |
||
|
Overall score |
1 |
SHMAK score 1 |
|
Return to the point in the document where this table is located.