Skip to main content.

Table: Taieri Catchment: Site Name: Barbours Stream

Return to the point in the document where this table is located.

 

Indicators Rating
1-5
Comments on the site

Catchment condition

2.5

Runanga comments, when they visited the site, were as follows:

Safety drinking the water

  • No.

Fishing at the site

  • No.

Eating the fish

  • No.

Balance

  • Both not good.
  • Slime is unappealing.

Overall health

  • Water quality not good at all. A lot of human interference on banks.
  • The slime trails are yuck.
  • Water detracts from the catchment.

Access at the site

  • Locked gates. DOC land.
  • Not really, this is private property. No I would not fish here.
  • Locked gates.

Harvesting mahinga kai from the site

  • Access and lack of quality.
  • We did not see any fish, maybe koura?
  • Too far. Too remote. Locked gates.

Final comments

  • Really horrible site.
  • Not a place to fish from. Most tussocks. Not a viable proposition. Too far from home.

Riverbank condition

4.5

River shape

-

Riparian vegetation

2.5

Indigenous vegetation
(on adjacent land)

3.6

Mahinga kai birds

1

Riverbed condition

2.6

Use of the river
(modifications)

2.6

Use of the river
(takes / discharges)

4

Flow visible

5

Flow heard

5

Odours present / absent

3

Water quality

4

Water clarity

4.5

Sediment present / absent

3

Use of riparian areas

1

Safety tasting water

1

Suitability for fishing

1

Safety eating fish

1

Balance between land and water

1.3

Abundance of birds

1

Diversity of birds

1

Abundance of plants

3.6

Species that were present when the site was surveyed were:

  • tussock, wawa, taramea, harakeke.

Diversity of plants

3.6

Access to the site

1

Suitability for harvesting mahinga kai

1.3

Overall score

1.6

MCI score 143

SHMAK score 3

 

Return to the point in the document where this table is located.