The following except from volume 2 (page 8.3-57) of the ANZECC guidelines provides useful guidance for the selection of an analytical method:
"Users may prefer to begin by measuring the total (unfiltered) metal concentration, because if this meets the guidelines then no further work is necessary (however, see cautionary notes in ANZECC & ARMCANZ [2000]). There is controversy surrounding total metal measurements and acid dissolution. From an analytical standpoint, the recovery of metals from the particulate phase will depend upon the ability of the dissolution technique to dissolve all of the metal. It can be reasonably argued that metals that are not solubilised by acid, need not be considered as having potential bioavailability. Thus, although methods have been described which measure total metals, the standard methods adopted by agencies such as the USEPA have been for acid soluble metals. These initially require sample preservation by acidification to pH <2, and then use different levels of acid treatment to measure either total recoverable metals or acid-soluble metals. Total recoverable metals are determined after digestion of the sample in a mixture of 0.15 M nitric and 0.10 M hydrochloric acids (Martin et al. 1991), while acid-soluble metals are those released by acidification to pH <2 at room temperature (Martin et al. 1991). The requirement for the rigour of the former treatment and the potential for sample contamination has been challenged (Martin et al. 1986). Recent results for acid-soluble metals have been found to be almost identical to total recoverable results (G Batley, pers. comm. 2000)."
In addition to the above, we note that:
Additional guidance on metal analytical methods can be found in the following sections of the ANZECC 2000 guidelines: