The Ministry for the Environment has commissioned Firecone to assess the nature and size of the problems associated with the current regime for managing end-of-life (EOL) tyres, and the costs and benefits of the range of potential solutions for addressing those problems. Specifically, Firecone has been asked to advise on:
In the remainder of this introduction and background section we briefly summarise:
Readers who are familiar with the tyre industry should skip to the next section 'Weaknesses of the Current Arrangements'.
Tyres come from a number of sources, and go to a number of uses and locations. Understanding this 'supply chain' is an important prerequisite for discussing how the management regime for EOL tyres could be improved.
A simplified diagram of the supply chain for EOL tyres in New Zealand is shown in Figure 1 below.
The following points should be noted in relation to the supply chain for EOL tyres:
It is surprisingly difficult to determine the number of EOL tyres that enter the system each year. Drawing on previous studies, the best estimate appears to be around 3.2 million per annum. However, estimates from previous studies range from 2.5 million (Opus) to 4 million (based on international evidence which suggests a ratio of one tyre per person per year).
On balance, we consider that the number of EOL tyres entering the system is likely to steadily increase over the next 3-5 years:
With the exception of the likely number of tyres used for silage pile weights in the coming years, which is uncertain, these indicators all suggest an increase in the number of tyres entering the system over the short to medium term.
There are no central or local government regulations that relate specifically to the management of EOL tyres. But a number of broader controls exist that are relevant.
It is illegal to dump tyres on any property, whether publicly or privately owned, without the owner's permission. Under section 15 of the Litter Act every person commits an offence who, without reasonable excuse:
In the case of an individual, they are liable to a fine not exceeding $500. In the case of a body corporate, they are liable to a fine not exceeding $2000.
Under the Resource Management Act (RMA) (section 9.1) no person may use any land in a manner that contravenes a rule in a district plan or proposed district plan unless the activity is expressly allowed by a resource consent granted by the territorial authority responsible for the plan. There is no doubt that storing tyres is a form of land use. Accordingly, local authorities have the clear ability to control or ban tyre piles through their district plans.
However, at present we are not aware of any local authority having done this.
Similarly, the Local Government Act (Part 8) gives local authorities the right to make bylaws to protect the public from nuisance, and to maintain public health and safety. It explicitly states that this includes the right to pass bylaws on:
While we have not sought specific legal advice on this issue, we suspect that if they preferred, local authorities could use bylaws also to control or ban private tyre piles.
Finally, the RMA can be used to prohibit or control the establishment of tyre piles where another activity that requires consent - such as moving earth to create space for a pile - needs to be undertaken to create the pile.
The fire service can require action over inappropriate tyre storage inside or adjacent to buildings, under its general powers. Similarly, any Rural Fire Authority can act to implement any fire control measures thought necessary on rural properties where tyre piles are thought to pose an unacceptable fire risk. And finally, local authorities can use their bylaw making powers to control activities they consider involve fire risks.
The Waipa District Council has a Fire Prevention Bylaw in place, and has used that Bylaw to insist on a tyre pile being removed. However, we are not aware of widespread use of these powers.
The disposal and storage of EOL tyres has a number of potential adverse environmental and health impacts. However, the nature and severity of those impacts depend on how the tyres have been stored or disposed of.
Where it is done properly, placing tyres in landfills has only very limited adverse environmental impacts, and no known adverse health impacts. Some leachate is likely to occur, but evidence suggests that it is relatively innocuous from a health and environmental perspective. [Preliminary Discussion Paper on Scrap Tyre Management in New Zealand, page 9] ['A National Approach to Waste Tyres', Australian Commonwealth Department of Environment, 2001.] Moreover, as landfills in New Zealand have been progressively upgraded, an increasing proportion of them now collect and treat leachate.
However, the impacts can be considerably greater where tyres are not stored adequately. The principal impacts come from tyres being stored without being shredded or crumbed - which has adverse implications for landfill management and the potential to provide a habitat for disease-carrying mosquitoes - and insufficient management of the fire risk.
Placing whole tyres in landfills (rather than quartering or shredding them) frequently causes practical difficulties. Whole tyres are very bulky for their mass. They also frequently trap gases and can slowly 'float' to the surface.[Tyres in the Environment, Section 4.5.] Together, these factors mean that placing whole tyres in landfills leads to the available space being filled up more quickly, and the landfill potentially becoming unstable. As a result the landfill management is more difficult and costly.
It is well established that water pooled in tyres provides an ideal breeding ground for some types of mosquito.[See New Zealand Ministry of Health Media Release, 21 March 2003.] In overseas jurisdictions piles of whole tyres stored above ground have therefore proved to be of considerable concern.
New Zealand currently has very few mosquitoes capable of carrying serious diseases, and those that exist do not appear to breed in tyres. However, mosquitoes capable of carrying serious diseases that are known to breed in tyres are discovered by MAF at the border relatively frequently. Accordingly the future establishment of a population of such mosquitoes in New Zealand is possible.
If establishment of a population occurred, above-ground tyre piles near urban centres would be a significant concern, as spraying them against mosquitoes is costly and ineffective.
Tyre fires produce hazardous air emissions and toxic effluent run-off which have adverse health and environmental implications. With regard to the health impacts, tyre fires produce smoke and run-off containing a range of toxic and carcinogenic compounds, including: dioxins; furans; mercury and lead. ['A National Approach to Waste Tyres', Australian Commonwealth Department of Environment, 2001.] Nearby, downwind communities therefore typically need to be evacuated in the event of a tyre fire. By way of example, 10 households were evacuated during a recent tyre fire near Hamilton, and one child was hospitalised.
With regard to the environmental impacts, the air emissions have the potential to contaminate water supplies and crops and the effluent run-off can contaminate nearby water sources and ground water. ['Preliminary Discussion Paper on Scrap Tyre Management in New Zealand', page 8.] The land itself can also be contaminated by the effluent run-off, limiting its further use. Environment Waikato collected 30,000 [Letter from Environment Waikato to MfE, 19 May 2003.] litres of oil from a nearby waterway during the tyre fire mentioned above.
New Zealand has yet to experience a large tyre fire - the Hamilton fire involved around 30,000 tyres. But overseas experience indicates that large tyre fires (involving piles of a million or more tyres) can burn for years.