The Waste Minimisation Act 2008 allows for the Minister for the Environment to formally endorse a product stewardship scheme through accreditation.
Any scheme that is seeking accreditation under the Act must meet certain minimum standards. However, a business may operate a product stewardship scheme without having it accredited under the Act. The Act specifically focuses on schemes minimising waste.
This part of the guide provides general information on how to set up a product stewardship scheme before applying for accreditation under the Act. Firstly there are references to the Act and what they mean for product stewardship schemes, then you will find some general information should you wish to consider implementing a product stewardship scheme and applying for accreditation.
Establishing a product stewardship scheme can be a complex process. There may be some aspects of establishing a scheme that require specialist input, such as marketing strategies, business strategies, project management, and environmental, legal and financial advice.
The requirements of an accredited scheme under the Act are covered in a separate guidance document entitled Guidance to Completing the Application Form for Accreditation of a Product Stewardship Scheme. See http://www.mfe.govt.nz/issues/waste/product-stewardship/accredited-schemes.html for a copy of this guide. It provides question-by-question help for completing the application for accreditation form.
See the Ministry for the Environment website http://www.mfe.govt.nz/issues/waste/product-stewardship/accredited-schemes-in-nz.html for a list of currently accredited schemes.
Figure 1 outlines the steps for a product stewardship scheme in the Act.
Read a description of figure 1
Product stewardship accreditation steps. A flow chart that takes the reader through the process steps as it relates to the sections of the Waste Minimisation Act for a priority product and a non-priority product.
This figure describes product stewardship as an overall concept. The following section describes the sections of the Act and how they apply to the product stewardship concept.

Read a description of figure 2
Product stewardship – a concept. A product stewardship scheme has the following inputs: funding, objectives and scope. The Scheme Manager, Responsible Participants and People Affected are the people that make up a scheme. The outputs are reporting, publicising and achievements. Surrounding a product stewardship scheme is compliance and good governance. The two goals from a product stewardship scheme are a reduction in environmental harm and waste minimisation.
An accredited product stewardship scheme must identify a scheme manager (section 14(a)).
A scheme must have a nominated scheme manager, who is the proposed contact person for the scheme, to qualify for accreditation.
The scheme manager:
In addition to applying for accreditation, once the scheme is accredited the scheme manager has a responsibility in:
A scheme manager does not have to be an independent job. The scheme manager could already work for the organisation implementing the scheme. The role of scheme manager could be full-time or it could be part of another role.
In the case of a scheme operated by a single business, the scheme manager may be an employee for that business.
An accredited product stewardship scheme must provide a description of the scope of the scheme, including the product or brand of product to which it applies (section 14(b)).
A scheme must have clear boundaries that define the scope of the proposed scheme. This includes a description of the product or products that it covers and/or the brand of product to which it applies. The scope of the scheme must not include stages in the life cycle of a product for which the scheme does not directly control, finance or influence. It may help to define what is out of scope of the scheme too.
Company A sells widgets imported from overseas in all its own-brand stores. The scheme scope covers all widgets sold by the company. The widgets are recovered from the consumer at end-of-life in all of Company A’s outlets. The outlets provide national coverage except for Milford Sound. The scheme has contracts with service providers for the recovery process which recovers the reusable components and sends them back to the manufacturing company overseas. The scheme does not have any influence over the widget design by the original manufacturing company or the components the manufacturer uses.
An accredited product stewardship scheme must set measurable waste minimisation, treatment, or disposal objectives for the product; and time frames for meeting the objectives (section 14(c)).
A scheme must have reduction, reuse, recycling, recovery, treatment and/or disposal objectives that are measureable and time dependent. To be accredited a scheme doesn’t need to have objectives for all of these categories. The choice of objectives should reflect the environmental impacts being addressed and the benefits it is attempting to capture.
An objective always relates to a product.
To meet the requirements of the Act the objectives need to be measurable so specific measurable targets will need to be set.
If there is an industry-wide scheme, then an objective may be reducing the amount of product sent to landfill over five years. If the scheme only applies to products sold from a particular shop, the objective may be that “an amount equivalent to 25 per cent of the product sold from shop X is reused” within 12 months.
Objectives don’t all have to be quantitative. Clear qualitative objectives are also acceptable as many waste minimisation objectives are less quantifiable. However, the advantages of quantitative objectives or targets are that they are unambiguous.
“Customers’ knowledge of recycling the product has increased within 12 months”. This can be confirmed through consumer surveys or itemising the improvements made that would intuitively lead to a more recyclable product.
Objectives should be time bound. Some will relate to the situation at the expiry of the scheme, but it is important that there are also intermediate objectives to help assess whether the scheme is on track and to maintain an ongoing sense of accomplishment.
We expect a good practice scheme to set ambitious, challenging objectives that will demonstrate a commitment to minimising waste beyond ‘business as usual’ and be prepared to explore innovative ways of meeting those objectives. In this case, it is reasonable to assume that in some instances objectives are not met.
To encourage innovative, ambitious schemes, section 18 of the Act allows revocation of a scheme’s accreditation on the basis of not meeting objectives if the Minister is satisfied that reasonable steps are not being taken to implement the scheme and the scheme’s objectives are not being met or are not likely to be met within the time frames set out in the scheme (section 18(1)(a)). It may be a challenge to meet the objectives but as long as clear effort is being made to meet the objectives and implement the scheme, accreditation is unlikely to be withdrawn.
An accredited product stewardship scheme must list the classes of person involved in the design, manufacture, sale, use, servicing, collection, recovery, recycling, treatment, and disposal of the product (section 14(d)).
A scheme must describe, at a high level, the potential groups involved in a product during its life (for example ‘retailers’ or ‘recyclers’). These people will not necessarily sign up to the scheme, as it is not necessary to name specific organisations or individuals, but the scheme application should make it clear who they are. This provides confidence that all affected groups have been identified and that:
The groups identified in section 14(d) do not need to confirm their participation as:
Parents with babies are a class of person involved in a nappy scheme.
An accredited product stewardship scheme must list the persons who have agreed to participate in the scheme and assign responsibility to them for meeting the scheme’s objectives (section 14(e)).
A scheme must identify persons (including businesses) who have agreed to participate in the scheme and have been assigned responsibility for achieving some or all of the scheme’s objectives.
Examples of participants with a responsibility in the scheme are:
A product stewardship scheme is an agreement between the participants. In agreeing to be part of the scheme, these participants agree to undertake the actions required to implement the scheme and help it achieve its objectives.
Evidence of the participant’s commitment to the scheme could be in the form of a:
This is different from those people listed in section 14(d) of the Act who have not accepted a responsibility in relation to the objectives.
Examples of participants who have signed up to a scheme are:
An accredited product stewardship scheme must specify the arrangements for making decisions under the scheme, the control and overall operation of the scheme, keeping records and making reports under the scheme (Section 14(f)).
Proper governance is necessary to ensure that the scheme:
Participants in a scheme should consider what an appropriate governance structure, including legal structure, is for the scheme, particularly when handling money flows (such as an advanced recycling fee). Many product stewardship schemes are formed as separate entities and referred to as a product stewardship organisation (PSO) or a producer responsibility organisation (PRO).
The Act does not specify a particular governance or legal structure for a product stewardship scheme. As part of the accreditation process, the Minister will look at schemes on a case-by-case basis to ensure that the governance, and if necessary, legal structure adopted is suitable for the scheme’s design and objectives. The governance could include recycling guidelines, agendas and meeting minutes, reporting and review of procedures, appointing a chairperson, setting quorum rules, and having a decision-making process.
If a product stewardship scheme involves collection of end-of-life products, then the scheme manager may formally contract:
A board is set up consisting of representatives from several companies participating in the scheme so decisions can be made on issues such as how collection points will be managed and who will be responsible for managing recycling of the collected product.
An accredited product stewardship scheme must identify the processes for compliance and enforcement of any agreements between participants to the scheme (section 14(h)).
A system is needed to ensure that participants identified in section 14(e) of the Act keep to the obligations they have committed to as part of a scheme. It is up to scheme participants to define their own enforcement mechanism. Typically this is achieved through legal contracts for the provision of services and the maintenance of agreements with participants.
The types of tools you could use to ensure compliance to the scheme are:
An accredited product stewardship scheme must provide for assessing the scheme’s performance and for reporting on its performance to the Minister (section 14(i))
and
the Secretary may monitor the performance of an accredited scheme (section 20).
The Secretary for the Environment needs information to monitor scheme performance and report to the Minister for the Environment.
To ensure success, a scheme must outline how it will go about monitoring progress towards its objectives and how it will convey this information to the Secretary and the Minister. Accreditation is a form of endorsement by the Government and so it is necessary that the Secretary and the Minister are confident the endorsement is justified on an ongoing basis.
It is important to consider not just what information will be reported on and how often, but what assessment method and information gathering method will be used. Monitoring of waste flows is difficult and can be subject to a high degree of uncertainty or be very expensive to obtain. To help the Secretary and the Minister assess the likelihood of this requirement being met, you must provide detail on how the targets will be measured.
For non-priority products there are no statutory minimum reporting requirements set out in the Act. The scheme must provide the information necessary to show that the scheme objectives and targets are being met. If necessary, the Secretary and/or the Minister can request additional information.
What is reported is not necessarily limited to the objectives. It may be useful to provide other measures to help build a more complete picture, highlight opportunities and weaknesses, and demonstrate efforts to achieving the scheme objectives.
You could report in any of the following ways:
Note: Information provided to the Ministry in support of product stewardship schemes is subject to the Official Information Act. Page 13 provides detail of how the Official Information Act applies to accreditation for product stewardship schemes.
An accredited product stewardship scheme must set out a strategy for publication of the scheme and set out how information will be provided to purchasers, users, and handlers of the product to which the scheme relates (section 14(j) and section 14(k)).
Publicising a scheme is important in achieving behaviour change as it:
It is important:
Additionally, it helps purchasers to be properly informed when making choices about purchasing the product and how to manage it when it reaches its end-of-life.
As mentioned above, given that information reported to the Minister may also be subject to public release, participants should consider releasing these reports to the public as well.
Clear, obvious signage in a shop specialising in a product may be sensible even for non-critical information, but not in a shop that handles hundreds of different products. Multiple methods should be considered, such as:
An accredited product stewardship scheme must clearly outline how the scheme is to be funded (section 14(l)).
The five main areas where schemes require funding are:
These funds could be provided from internal business accounts, through membership fees or through product fees or price increases.
The aim of any product stewardship scheme is to internalise the costs. Instead of the end user or disposal facility having to pay for managing the end-of-life product (such as rates or disposal facility charges) the costs are built into the product life cycle and the price.
A recovery operation where the value of the recovered material provides a significant level of funding, perhaps enough to fund all of the scheme costs.
An accredited product stewardship scheme must reduce the environmental impact of the product overall (section 15(1)(c)).
The Minister can only accredit a scheme if it is likely to promote waste minimisation or reduce the environmental harm from disposal without causing greater environmental harm over the life cycle of the product.
If a scheme proposed that a small amount of toxic material be removed from the manufactured product, but the effect of this drastically increased energy usage, then the Minister would need to consider whether the environmental benefits from the reduced end-of-life waste impact were likely to be exceeded by the environmental costs of higher energy usage over its operational life.
Where relevant, depending on the nature of the scheme, the Minister may make this decision based on an understanding of the life cycle impacts of a product, and so it is helpful if the scheme considers this information and presents it to the Minister at the point of accreditation.
There is no minimum requirement for the reduction of environmental harm under the Act for non-priority schemes. However, the scheme must operate within the stated scope and demonstrate a reduction in environmental harm. Assessment of a product stewardship scheme will require evidence of any environmental benefits made. This could be in the form of contracts or agreements. The application should be able to demonstrate that there is no significant increase to environmental harm elsewhere in its life cycle as a perverse outcome of the scheme. The scheme must be able to provide evidence of its duty of care, both up and downstream.
An Environmental Choice licence, if the product has one, supports the life cycle impact assessment of the scheme.
A complete life cycle analysis (LCA) can be a very complex and expensive exercise. It is not the intention that a scheme must do this to be accredited. However, a life cycle ‘philosophy’ is expected.
For more guidance on this section please refer to the Assessors’ Specification Guidelines for Accreditation of a Product Stewardship Scheme and the Guidance to Completing the Application Form for Accreditation of a Product Stewardship Scheme available on the Ministry website. See http://www.mfe.govt.nz/issues/waste/product-stewardship/accredited-schemes.htmlfor these guidance documents and forms.