Archived publication
This publication is no longer current or has been superseded.
A variety of approaches were used to supplement the information provided from LANDATA and from FleetCheck audits, and to seek specific information on procurement practices. These included:
Information obtained from the surveys is discussed in this section. An overview of the phone interview process is also discussed, with the results of the phone interviews themselves presented as case studies in Section 8.
A questionnaire was sent to selected organisations in the wider government fleet, asking for information on three areas of fleet procurement and fleet management:
The questions on fleet characteristics were generally quantitative in their approach, while most of the questions on procurement and fleet management/reporting were qualitative.
A copy of the questionnaire is included in Appendix B.
Surveys were sent to 33 government departments and business units, 28 of which completed the questionnaire. Appendix C lists the organisations that were sent and completed the survey.
The organisations were selected to represent a range of government departments and business units and to maximise the survey coverage. Based on the fleet sizes in LANDATA, the surveyed organisations make up 66 percent of the total fleet. The organisations were also selected to provide a reasonable representation over the key organisation groups, so the survey results are considered a good representation of the total fleet. The exception is Offices of Parliament, which was not included.
Detailed survey findings are set out in Appendix E, with summarised conclusions below.
Reported fleet data - numbers of vehicles, makes, engine size, and vehicle age - is generally consistent with the LANDATA information.
The top makes of vehicles purchased by government agencies are Toyota, Ford, Nissan, Hyundai, Holden and Mazda.
In the main those responsible for fleet procurement are inside the organisation (in finance or procurement departments) and negotiate directly with local dealers or manufacturers. Only two organisations indicate that they use external fleet managers and two use lease providers. Under 'other', a number of organisations referred to a GSB contract or syndicated contracts.
Around 85 percent of vehicles are purchased either directly by organisations or through GSB or other purchase arrangements.
While a number of organisations consider operating costs and whole-of-life costing in their procurement decisions it is hard to judge the level of detail to which these are carried out.
Safety, fit for purpose, environment, operating costs, whole-of-life costs and upfront capital costs are indicated as the top six drivers for fleet vehicle selection.
Safety considerations rank highly and safety rankings are commonly used in vehicle procurement policies. Some features selected for safety purposes such as air conditioners and automatic transmission can have an environmental cost.
The challenge with environmental considerations comes in their practical implementation.
Most respondents have a regular vehicle maintenance policy. While most respondents track vehicle use, only 18 out of 28 focus on measuring and managing efficiencies. Use may be tracked for cost management, maintenance schedules and replacement purposes rather for managing fleet efficiencies or considering alternatives transport or vehicle options.
A number of respondents did indicate that systems for better fleet management are either being implemented or are planned.
Based on the survey responses, the following organisations were selected for follow-up with a phone interview:
These organisations were selected for phone interviews as their survey responses showed they had practices and procedures that demonstrated various aspects of good practice for selecting and managing vehicle fleets.
The selected organisations hesitated to use the term 'best practice' when referring to their processes or systems. Interviewees generally felt they were making good headway in some areas of their fleet procurement and management, but not as much progress in other areas. However, all interviewees showed a commitment to improving their current fleet performance.
Highlighting the methods and steps undertaken by organisations progressing towards a best practice process is valuable, particularly for those organisations that see the process as being too difficult or do not know how to proceed.
These phone interviews are summarised as case studies in Section 8.