List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
Database Title |
6.1 Adventive marine biota dataset |
|---|---|
| Keywords Type1. Type 11. |
New Zealand marine; biota; adventive; extent |
| Abstract | A variety of existing information sources were used to compile the adventive marine species dataset. Each potential adventive species was tested against nine criteria developed by Chapman and Carlton (1994) to identify adventive species. Cranfield et al (1998) found 148 plant and animal species that had been accidentally introduced that met at least three of the criteria, and four species that established after being deliberately introduced. Rates of entry of adventive species into the marine environment were estimated |
| Geographical Coverage | New Zealand EEZ below mean high springs. |
| Dataset start date. | Unknown |
| Dataset end date. | Current |
| Status/currency. | In progress |
| Update frequency. | Unknown |
| Maintenance. | NIWA. Likely to become incorporated in a wider marine species database. |
Technical Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Parameters- what is measured |
|
| Parameters- what is calculated | N/A |
| Methods used to measure parameters | Reviewed literature, unpublished reports and personal communications. Biogeographical data for each species was tested against nine criteria developed by Chapman and Carlton (1994) to identify adventive species. |
| Scale of use. | N/A |
| Number of records |
|
| GIS compatibility. | N/A |
| Available formats for users. | Publication: Cranfield et al, 1998. |
| Access constraints. | Information in public arena. |
| Measurement Accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Completeness of dataset | To be completed by database manager. |
| Positional accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Database steward | NIWA |
| Database custodian | NIWA |
| Database custodian contact person | Barbara Hayden |
| Database custodian Contact Address Phone Fax |
NIWA PO Box 8602 Christchurch +64 3 348 8987 +64 3 348 5548 b.hayden@niwa.co.nz |
| References | Chapman, J.W.; Carlton, J.T. 1994. Predicted discoveries of the introduced isopod Synidotea laevidorsalis (Miers, 1881). Journal of Crustacean
Biology 11 : 386-400. Cranfield, H.J.; Gordon, D.P.; Willan, R.C.; Marshall, B.A.; Battershill, C.N.; Francis, M.P.; Nelson, W.A.; Glasby, C.J.; Read, G.B. 1998. Adventive marine species in New Zealand. NIWA Technical Report 34. 48p. |
| Date metadata record prepared. | June 2000 |
| Author of metadata record. | Victoria Froude |
Management Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Original purpose. | To collate known information on adventive marine biota. |
| Relationships with classification systems. | Careful use of taxonomic classification is needed to ensure accurate identification of species. |
| Relationships with other databases | Unknown |
| Known relationships with proposed EPIP indicators. | Could contribute to:
|
| Database uses? | Research and education purposes. Publication by Cranfield et al has provided impetus for some management agencies to initiate monitoring programmes that look at adventive biota. |
| Public awareness of the database | Relatively low |
| Database strengths. |
|
| Database limitations. |
|
What are the Current and Emerging Uses of the Database for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/baseline. | To a limited extent for some species, depending on historical records. |
| Assisting with determining current state/baseline. | Identifies current marine adventive species and their general distribution. |
| Assisting with modeling possible future outcomes. | No |
| Risk assessment. | The identification of adventive species, their current distribution along with other information (eg. currents) would facilitate the identification of risk areas for future spread. |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design. | N/A |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally or nationally. | Should be able to report regionally and nationally. |