List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
Database Title |
11.1 Department of Conservation Land Register |
|---|---|
| Keywords Type1. Type 11. |
Protected areas; legal status; land; terrestrial; marine |
| Abstract | This is an electronic database which has specified administrative information about land of the Crown administered by the Department of Conservation and other specified land. It is associated with a system of map records and original source data held at the Conservancy level. Primary records are for land of the Crown which the Department administers and holds under the following status:
Primary records also include land vested in an administrating body under the Reserves Act where a reversionary interest is held by the Crown. Secondary records in the database are for private or Maori land which has legal protection by way of:
The third group of records is for any other land on which information is kept in accordance with the practice of each Conservancy. It usually includes reserves where the notice of classification is given to the Department by a local authority under section 16(2B) Reserves Act. Information is stored by "conservation units" (C.U.). The parcels of land that form a C.U. must have the following attributes in common:
|
| Geographical Coverage | New Zealand including offshore islands and offshore island groups. |
| Dataset start date. | Unknown |
| Dataset end date. | Current |
| Status/currency. | In progress |
| Update frequency. | Records are updated, removed or added as required. |
Technical Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Parameters- what is measured | For each conservation unit the following are measured:
|
| Parameters- what is calculated |
|
| Methods used to measure parameters | A manual specifies the procedures for entering/amending the relevant data for each conservation unit. |
| Secondary sources of data | Maps of administrative unit boundaries. |
| Scale of use. | Areas are recorded in hectares to 4 decimal places to tie into the Digital Cadastral Database. The measurements are not that accurate. National scale of DOC GIS system is 1:250,000. |
| Number of records | Approximately 18,000 conservation units. |
| GIS compatibility. | Each conservation unit has a digitised boundary link to the DOC GIS system. Currently national scale 1:250,000. |
| Available formats for users. | Computer data; summary reports from electronic database. Paper cards are retained because the previous electronic system was not user friendly. |
| Access constraints. | Anyone on DOC network has access. Public access may be possible - may be a cost. |
| Measurement Accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Completeness of dataset | To be completed by database manager. |
| Positional accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Database steward | Department of Conservation |
| Database custodian | Department of Conservation |
| Database custodian contact person | Les Jones |
| Database custodian Contact Address Phone Fax |
Science, Technical and Information Services Department of Conservation PO Box 10 240 Wellington +64 4 471 0726 +64 4 471 1082 ljones@doc.govt.nz |
| References | Land register user manual. |
| Date metadata record prepared. | October 1999 |
| Author of metadata record. | Victoria Froude |
Management Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Original purpose. | The need for a Department of Conservation wide standard for recording information about land administered by the Department, and for its computerisation, was recognised in 1988. The original designers intended that the national land register would create a framework that would allow information on other land based activities of the Department to be computerised. When the Department changed its operating system in 1992, a variety of problems lead to a review of the land register. This review found that the register did not meet its original intentions in some aspects. As a consequence of the review a National Land Register Redevelopment Project was setup in 1996. |
| Relationships with classification systems. | Links with administrative classification systems. |
| Relationships with other databases |
|
| Known relationships with proposed EPIP indicators. | Could contribute to:
|
| Database uses? | DOC staff. |
| Public awareness of the database | Low for general public. Used by councils and organisations like LINZ. |
| Database strengths. |
|
| Database limitations. |
|
What are the Current and Emerging Uses of the Database for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/baseline. | Could identify location and extent of protected areas in earlier years. |
| Assisting with determining current state/baseline. | Identifies the location and extent of different types (by legislative status) of protected areas. |
| Assisting with modeling possible future outcomes. | N/A |
| Risk assessment. | N/A |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design. | This would be possible if sampling is based on areas with different legislative status. |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally or nationally. | Data can be reported locally (DOC area, city council/district council); regionally (regional council/unitary authority) and nationally. |