List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
Database Title |
6.6 Sites of Special Wildlife Interest |
|---|---|
| Keywords Type1. Type 11. |
Terrestrial; freshwater; estuaries; coastal wildlife habitat; birds; invertebrates; bats |
| Abstract | This database ranks terrestrial, freshwater and estuarine/coastal wildlife habitats using a 5 point scale with detailed criteria. The 5 categories are:
The data in the database was primarily collected during a nationwide survey carried out by the New Zealand Wildlife Service during the 1970's and 1980's to identify Sites of Special Wildlife Interest. |
| Geographical Coverage | New Zealand |
| Dataset start date. | 1970's |
| Dataset end date. | 1980's |
| Status/currency. | Finished |
| Update frequency. | N/A |
| Maintenance. | N/A |
Technical Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Parameters- what is measured |
|
| Parameters- what is calculated | N/A |
| Methods used to measure parameters | Wildlife habitat was identified on maps and then inspected in the fields. Each habitat of significant size was recorded as a site of special wildlife interest. Special effort was made to find rare/inconspicuous species by, for example, playing tapes of bird calls. |
| Scale of use. | 1:50,000 and 1:63,000. Minimum size for recorded habitats - 10ha for forest; 0.5ha for wetlands. |
| Number of records | Unknown. |
| GIS compatibility. | Data is recorded for spatially defined units using 1:50,000 and 1:63,000 scale topo maps so it would be possible. Care would be needed in interpretation as some spatial units are large and may be quite heterogeneous. |
| Available formats for users. |
|
| Access constraints. | Information is freely available. |
| Measurement Accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Completeness of dataset | To be completed by database manager. |
| Positional accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Database steward | (former) NZ Wildlife Service |
| Database custodian | Department of Conservation |
| Database custodian contact person | Tim Holmes |
| Database custodian Contact Address Phone Fax |
Department of Conservation Private Bag Wanganui +64 6 345 2402 tholmes@doc.govt.nz |
| References | Numerous reports have been prepared reporting on the regional results of
the survey. For example: Moynihan, K.T. 1986. Wildlife and sites of special wildlife interest in the western Waikato Region. Fauna Survey Unit Report No. 41. New Zealand Wildlife Service, Department of Internal Affairs : Wellington. Hogarth, I. 1987. Survey systems and survey data in districts. In Proceedings of the survey seminar held at University of Auckland 12 June 1987. DOC Northern Region Misc Report Series No. 1. |
| Date metadata record prepared. | October 1999 |
| Author of metadata record. | Victoria Froude |
Management Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Original purpose. | The ongoing loss of indigenous forest and wetland habitats led to the establishment of the Fauna Survey Unit of the New Zealand Wildlife Service in the late 1970's. The purpose of this unit was to undertake a nationwide survey to identify Sites of Special Wildlife Interest. This information was to be used for management and conservation planning and for the initial assessment of the environmental consequences of projected developments. Each regional survey attempted to visit all wildlife sites of significance. Inspections were brief because of the need to build up a national inventory in as short a time as possible. |
| Relationships with classification systems. | Species taxonomy. |
| Relationships with other databases | Major part of many local authority databases on significant natural areas in their region/district. |
| Known relationships with proposed EPIP indicators. | Not known |
| Database uses? | This paper based database has been used extensively by government agencies, local authorities and community organisations. While the database is still being used there are increasing problems due to the age of the data. Major uses include:
|
| Public awareness of the database | This database is widely known and used. |
| Database strengths. |
|
| Database limitations. |
|
What are the Current and Emerging Uses of the Database for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/baseline. | The database can assist with determining bird distribution and abundance and wildlife habitat value during the 1970's and 1980's. Matching with current data can show historical changes. |
| Assisting with determining current state/baseline. | Most of the data is old and needs updating. |
| Assisting with modeling possible future outcomes. | N/A |
| Risk assessment. | It identifies sites of wildlife habitat value that could be vulnerable to development pressures. |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design. | It could be used to stratify different types and/or rankings of wildlife habitat at a general level. Currency would need to be assessed prior to use. |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally or nationally. | This would be possible. |