List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
8.0 Summary of Selected New Zealand Marine Classification Systems and Spatial Frameworks
Part One National Systems
| Name of system. | Geomorphic classification of estuaries (Hume & Herdendorf) | Coastal and marine ecological areas of NZ (King, Bailey, Clark) | UNEP GRID NZ classification of wetlands. | DOC Ecosystem based coastal classification | NIWA estuary classification. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date developed. | 1988. | 1985. | 1999 (estuaries piloted; open coast marine not yet piloted). | In development. | In development |
| Geographic coverage. | NZ. | NZ :coast and shelf of 3 main islands. | NZ. | NZ territorial sea | NZ estuaries |
| Scale of operation. | Variable | 4-5cm:60NM. | Higher levels 1:250,000; detailed levels 1:50,000-1:10,000. | Biogeographic regions (100's-1000's km); Coastal marine units (10's-100's km) |
Unknown. |
| Classification based on: | |||||
| 1.biogeographical regions. | No | Yes. | No | Yes. | Unlikely |
| 2.identifying habitats and communities. | No | No | Levels III &IV use structural class and dominant cover. | ? | Finer levels of the classification will probably use habitats at the trophic level |
| 3.physical processes and /or characteristics. | Yes. | No | Levels I &II use key physical parameters that affect biol communities. | ? | Primary focus. |
| Coast/marine area covered: | |||||
| 1.coastal terrestrial. | No | Yes (inland limit may reach terrestrial extent of marine influence including habitats such as dunes & wetlands.) | Includes supratidal (eg splash zone) | No | ? |
| 2.estuarine. | Yes | Yes | Yes. | Yes | Yes-focus |
| 3.open coast intertidal. | No | Yes (as part of a biogeographic unit) | Yes. | Yes? | No |
| 4.open coast subtidal inshore. | No | Yes to shelf break as slope changes at 130-200m depth. | Yes (partly trialed, but probably limited to shallow waters.) | Yes to 100m depth | No |
| 5.open coast subtidal offshore. | No | No | No | No | No |
| Structure of classification: | |||||
| 1.level 1. | Estuary classes(5)- based on primary mode of origin of depositional basin. | Neritic territories (3) mapped. | I-hydrosystem(eg estuarine,). IA-subsystem(eg intertidal, subtidal) |
Biogeographic regions (8) | Physical parameters and processes will be used to define types of estuaries. This may include catchment characteristics. |
| 2. level 2. | Estuary types (16) - based on estuary geomorphic and oceanographic characteristics | Coastal ecological regions (27) and shelf ecological regions(10) mapped. | II-wetland class (eg saltmarsh, mudflat). IIA- wetland form (eg lagoon, estuary) |
Coastal marine units - based on geomorphological, local watermass and biotic information. | Within estuaries habitats and communities will probably be defined at the trophic level. |
| 3. level 3. | No | Coastal and shelf ecological districts mapped. | III- structural class (eg. rushland, mussel reef, cockle bed.) | No | Sensitivity of estuary types and possibly the biota to sedimentation will be identified. |
| 4. other levels. | No | No | IV-dominant cover (eg. Leptocarpus-Juncus; Chione | No | ? |
| Applications: | |||||
| 1.original purpose. | Tool designed to facilitate transfer of case study results between estuaries of the same type where environmental processes are similar. | Develop an ecological framework for planning and managing a system of representative marine and coastal areas. | Framework for analysing the spatial extent (and condition) of wetland (aquatic ecosystem) types. | To facilitate the development of a network of marine reserves for New Zealand. | To allow managers and researchers to appropriately apply estuarine research results to areas beyond that of the original investigations. |
| 2.known uses. | Classification developed with pilots of estuarine component in Auckland, Waikato, Canterbury. Current applications to Marlborough estuaries; and by Cawthron to 8 NZ estuaries for a SMF monitoring project. | Still being developed. | Still being developed. |
See section 7 for full references and more complete descriptions.
Part Two: Examples of Local Habitat Classifications used by Auckland Regional Council
| Name of system | 1. Morrisey,1994 marine habitats of conservation significance | 2. Tricklebank et al 1997 habitats for marine ecological monitoring. | 3. Auckland University West Coast Ecology | 4. Hewitt: Classification for State of environment monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date developed | 1994 | 1997 | 2000 | 2000 |
| Geographic coverage | Auckland Region | Auckland Region | Auckland Region West Coast open coast | Auckland Region |
| Scale of operation | 10's km | 10's km | 10-100m | 10's km |
| Classification basis: | ||||
| 1.biogeographic units | Yes | |||
| 2.identifying habitats and communities | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| 3.physical processes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Coastal/marine area covered: | ||||
| 1.coastal terrestrial | ||||
| 2.estuarine | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| 3.open coast intertidal | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| 4.open coast subtidal inshore | Yes | Yes | Yes (west coast) | Yes |
| 5. open coast subtidal offshore | ||||
| Structure of classification | ||||
| 1.level 1 | Broad level geomorphic unit (e.g. large harbours/estuaries; exposed sandy beaches) | Broad level biogeographic division (East and West Coast) | Broad substrate divisions of geology and geomorphology (e.g. volcanic sandstone platform, basalt cliff) | Exposure and tidal zone (e.g sheltered subtidal coast) |
| 2.level 2 | Habitat units using a variety of drivers (e.g. sheltered rocky reefs; exposed sandy gravels) | Broad substrate division (rocky and soft) | Finer scale geomorphology (e.g. caves, rock outcrops) | Substrate (e.g. sand -mud; rocky) and sometimes geomorphic element (e.g. beach channel) |
| 3.level 3 | Exposure and turbidity combinations (e.g. high exposure and low turbidity) | Very fine scale geomorphology (crevices, rock pools) | ||
| 4. other levels | Depth categories | Exposure categories | ||
| Original purpose | Selecting areas of ecological and geomorphic value to be identified in the regional coastal plan | To provide a basis for design of a marine ecological monitoring network for Auckland | To monitor West Coast ecology especially the large kelp Durvillaea antartica. | Part of a proposed marine state of environment monitoring programme |
1.Morrisey, D.J. 1994. Marine habitat mapping of the Auckland Region. NIWA Consultancy Report for ARC.
2.Tricklebank, K.; Babcock, R. ; Creese,B. 1997. Marine habitats of the Auckland Region. University of Auckland Report for ARC.
3.Report in preparation for Auckland Regional Council (information from Dominic McCarthy, ARC)
4.Hewitt, J.E. 2000. Design of a state of environment monitoring programme for the Auckland Region. NIWA Client Report for ARC.