List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
Database Title |
14.5 National River Water Quality Network |
|---|---|
| Keywords Type1. Type 11. |
Freshwater, water quality, rivers |
| Abstract | The National River Water Quality Network includes 77 sites distributed throughout the North Island (44 sites) and South Island (33 sites). The network was established in early 1989 using an agreed to design. At each site river flow, physical and chemical attributes and nuisance periphyton cover are measured either monthly or four weekly. The sites were selected to reflect both "baseline" conditions (32 upstream sites) and "impact" conditions (45 downstream sites). The field work is carried out by NIWA's 14 regional hydrometric field teams. The laboratory analyses are carried out at the NIWA Hamilton laboratory. |
| Geographical Coverage | New Zealand North and South Islands |
| Dataset start date. | 1989 |
| Dataset end date. | Current |
| Status/currency. | In progress |
| Update frequency. | Monthly with each new data set |
| Maintenance. | PGSF funded database (part of Water Resources Archive) |
Technical Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Parameters- what is measured |
|
| Parameters- what is calculated | Trends in the above parameters adjusted to recognise natural seasonal variation and flow dependence in some parameters. |
| Methods used to measure parameters | Field teams visited the sites once per month. At each site sampling was at the same time of day to remove diurnal variation. Field measurements included the first four items listed in parameters measured. Samples were collected for laboratory analyses of the remaining parameters measured. Every effort was made to ensure that field and laboratory sampling and measurement was consistent. |
| Secondary sources of data | N/A |
| Scale of use. | N/A |
| Number of records | 10 years of monthly data (120 records) for 77 sites. |
| GIS compatibility. | Yes (point data) |
| Available formats for users. | The raw data is in Excel tables. Annual reports Published papers |
| Access constraints. | The data is freely available. |
| Measurement Accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Completeness of dataset | To be completed by database manager. |
| Positional accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Database steward | NIWA |
| Database custodian | NIWA |
| Database custodian contact person | Graham Bryers |
| Database custodian Contact Address Phone Fax |
P.O. Box 11 115 Hillcrest Hamilton +64 7 856 7026 +64 7 856 0151 g.bryers@niwa.cri.nz |
| References | Smith, D.G.; Maasadam, R. 1994 New Zealand's national river quality network.
1 Design and physico-chemical characterization. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research: Vol. 28: 19-35..
Smith, D.G.; McBride, G.B.; Bryers, G.G.; Wisse, J.; Mink, D.F.J. 1996. Rends in New Zealand's national river water quality network. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research: Vol. 30: 285-500. Smith, D.G.; McBride, G.B.; Bryers, G.G.; Davies-Colley, R.J.; Quinn, J.M.; Vant, W.N. 1989. A national water quality network for New Zealand. DSIR Water Quality Centre Consultancy Report 8016/2. |
| Date metadata record prepared. | October 1999 |
| Author of metadata record. | Victoria Froude |
Management Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Original purpose. | To detect significant trends in water quality.
To develop better understanding of the nature of water resources and thereby assist their management |
| Relationships with classification systems. | N/A |
| Relationships with other databases | Part of the National Water Resources Archive. |
| Known relationships with proposed EPIP indicators. | N/A |
| Who uses this database? |
|
| Public awareness of the database | There is good awareness among regional council staff. Otherwise awareness is generally low. |
| Database strengths. |
|
| Database limitations. |
|
What are the Current and Emerging Uses of the Database for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/baseline. | The database will, over time, provide a historic baseline. This will allow comparison because there have been no changes in methods. |
| Assisting with determining current state/baseline. | The database provides a current baseline for a number of water quality parameters. |
| Assisting with modeling possible future outcomes. | The database is being used for trends analysis. It has been used for the hearings of some water conservation orders e.g. Mohaka, Motu and Wanganui. |
| Risk assessment. | The database is being used to develop models to predict the effects of land-use changes on river water quality (especially nutrient levels and water clarity). |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design. | The monitoring network has been carefully designed to cover a range of land uses and both control and impact sites. |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally or nationally. | Data can be reported at different levels. At this stage the focus has been on national trends analysis. |