List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
Database Title |
13.1 National Soils Database |
|---|---|
| Keywords Type1. Type 11. |
Soils Soil profiles, soil chemistry; soil physics; soil mineralogy |
| Abstract | This database is a collection of soil profiles, site descriptions and chemical, physical and mineralogical characteristics for about 3000 soils in New Zealand. The analyses were largely carried out by the former DSIR Soil Bureau. Data from 1964 to 1992 is held in Paradox for Windows - a PC based relational database (1500 soil profiles). Pre-1964 data is held in a card filing system. The analyses date back to 1938 and in some cases before 1938. The National Soils Database consists of the following tables:
|
| Geographical Coverage | New Zealand |
| Dataset start date. | 1938 |
| Dataset end date. | 1992 |
| Status/currency. | The database is currently dormant. |
| Update frequency. | N/A |
| Maintenance. | Minimal funding is available to update the database. There is ongoing correction of entries.
Little new data is being collected and what is collected is not of the same standard as the earlier data (i.e. only partial analysis is being done). The database has not used partial entries so far. It is very expensive to add items to this database as there are so many fields for each soil profile. Analyses cost more than $10,000 per profile. |
Technical Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Parameters- what is measured |
|
| Parameters- what is calculated | N/A |
| Methods used to measure parameters | Standard soil analysis methods. |
| Secondary sources of data | N/A |
| Scale of use. | Point data only. |
| Number of records | Approximately 3000 soil profiles. |
| GIS compatibility. | The soils are located using point data. NZ map grid is used. |
| Available formats for users. | Paradox tables. |
| Access constraints. | The data is freely available for researchers (there may be some cost associated
with ordering the data). Commercial users are required to pay for the data and time it takes to assemble that data. |
| Measurement Accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Completeness of dataset | To be completed by database manager. |
| Positional accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Database steward | Landcare Research |
| Database custodian | Landcare Research |
| Database custodian contact person | Janice Willoughby ; Hugh Wilde |
| Database custodian Contact Address Phone Fax |
Private Bag 11052 Palmerston North +64 6 356 7154 +64 6 355 9230 willoughbyj@landcare.cri.nz ; wildeh@landcare.cri.nz |
| References | Willoughby, E.J; Baker, I.R. 1995. Standard input/output procedures for
the national soils database using Paradox and Windows. Unpublished Landcare
Research New Zealand Ltd. Report.
Numerous references on soil survey methods and analyses. |
| Date metadata record prepared. | October 1999 |
| Author of metadata record. | Victoria Froude |
Management Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Original purpose. | As part of the soil survey of New Zealand that sought to characterize New Zealand's soils, "representative" soils were selected for further analysis. |
| Relationships with classification systems. | The New Zealand Soil Classification (Hewitt) is used to classify soils. |
| Relationships with other databases | The database can be linked to the New Zealand Land Resource Inventory Database to show the spatial distribution of selected soil attributes including soil carbon (New Zealand Soils Spatial Database). |
| Known relationships with proposed EPIP indicators. | N/A |
| Who uses this database? | The database is used primarily for research purposes by universities, regional
councils and Landcare Research. For example the database has been used to:
develop soil degradation indices; predict soil quality indicators for different
soil groups and land uses; and to relate cation exchange capacity to total
carbon and % clay.
Private Consultants make some use of the database. |
| Public awareness of the database | Low. |
| Database strengths. |
|
| Database limitations. |
|
What are the Current and Emerging Uses of the Database for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/baseline. | This would require a series of records over time. This has not happened. Some data is however old and so is historic data (1930's and 1940's). |
| Assisting with determining current state/baseline. | This can occur in locations where detailed soil analyses have been done. Originally profiles were made on unfertilised soils. Because of the age of some of the data the attributes recorded for the soil profile may have changed in some cases. |
| Assisting with modeling possible future outcomes. | N/A |
| Risk assessment. | N/A |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design. | The data is from points and is not necessarily representative. |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally or nationally. | Aggregating point data would not be appropriate. |