List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
Database Title |
11.3 Geological Maps of New Zealand: |
|---|---|
| Keywords Type1. Type 11. |
Geology, maps Lithology |
| Abstract | These databases depict surface geology at different scales. Usually units less than 10 m thick are ignored especially if they are on top of hard rock. |
| Geographical Coverage |
|
| Dataset start date. | The field collection of data took place from the 1970s on. Digitising of
data:
|
| Dataset end date. | Current |
| Status/currency. |
|
| Update frequency. | N/A |
| Maintenance. | 2. This is the only map series where there is commitment to complete the data set because there is PGSF funding. |
Technical Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Parameters- what is measured | Field notes are made on:
|
| Parameters- what is calculated | Geological classes |
| Methods used to measure parameters | Notes are made in the field of rock units, boundaries between rock units, faults, structure of rock, and orientation of some rocks. The observations are plotted on maps at points. Homogeneous units are then inferred and classes defined on the map sheet. |
| Secondary sources of data | Relevant published / unpublished information. |
| Scale of use. | As in title. |
| Number of records | There are approximately 350 000 points. |
| GIS compatibility. |
|
| Available formats for users. | Published map sheet and description. CD if on GIS |
| Access constraints. | A charging policy is being worked out. There may be restriction on access to some point data (e.g. the copyright for some data does not belong with IGNS) |
| Measurement Accuracy |
|
| Completeness of dataset | To be completed by database manager. |
| Positional accuracy |
|
| Database steward | IGNS |
| Database custodian | IGNS |
| Database custodian contact person | David Heron |
| Database custodian Contact Address Phone Fax |
P.O. Box 30 368 Lower Hutt +64 4 570 4610 +64 4 570 4600 d.heron@gns.cri.nz |
| References |
|
| Date metadata record prepared. | October 1999 |
| Author of metadata record. | Victoria Froude |
Management Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Original purpose. |
|
| Relationships with classification systems. | Rocks are grouped firstly on the basis of age and secondly on lithology. Lithology becomes increasingly important at more detailed scales of mapping. |
| Relationships with other databases | Information from other databases is used including:
|
| Known relationships with proposed EPIP indicators. | N/A |
| Who uses this database? | The polygons are used in other projects including:
Geological map databases are used by regional councils, district councils, consultants and a variety of other scientists. |
| Public awareness of the database | Some inquiries are made to the Web Site. Information on the database is presented at scientific conferences. |
| Database strengths. |
|
| Database limitations. |
|
What are the Current and Emerging Uses of the Database for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/baseline. | This database shows changes in interpretation rather than changes in geology. |
| Assisting with determining current state/baseline. | The database shows current geology. |
| Assisting with modeling possible future outcomes. | The database is being used for modeling purposes. For example assessing the outcomes with different geological event scenarios. |
| Risk assessment. | The geological map database is assisting in the determination of: ground shaking amplification; land sliding and liquefaction hazard. |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design. | There is no sample design in geology. |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally or nationally. |
|