List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
Database Title |
11.1 Active Faults Database |
|---|---|
| Keywords Type1. Type 11. |
Geological features, faults, earthquakes, hazards. |
| Abstract | The arcs of active faults are mapped on the ground surface at 1:50 000 capture scale. |
| Geographical Coverage | New Zealand |
| Dataset start date. | 1968 |
| Dataset end date. | Current |
| Status/currency. | In progress |
| Update frequency. | As required. |
| Maintenance. | Primarily funded through PGSF. |
Technical Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Parameters- what is measured |
|
| Parameters- what is calculated |
|
| Methods used to measure parameters | Mapping of prehistoric earthquakes. |
| Secondary sources of data | |
| Scale of use. | 1:50 000 |
| Number of records | Unknown |
| GIS compatibility. | Yes |
| Available formats for users. | Arc Info data files that can be exported to other formats. Hard copy maps 1:50 000 (NZMS 260) |
| Access constraints. | |
| Measurement Accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Completeness of dataset | To be completed by database manager. |
| Positional accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Database steward | IGNS |
| Database custodian | IGNS |
| Database custodian contact person | Dr Kevin Berryman |
| Database custodian Contact Address Phone Fax |
P.O Box 30 368 Lower Hutt +64 4 5701444 +64 4 570 1440 k.berryman@gns.cri.nz |
| References | |
| Date metadata record prepared. | October 1999 |
| Author of metadata record. | Victoria Froude |
Management Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Original purpose. |
|
| Relationships with classification systems. | N/A |
| Relationships with other databases |
|
| Known relationships with proposed EPIP indicators. | N/A |
| Who uses this database? | Users include regional councils, territorial local authorities, utility operators and the insurance industry. The database is used for planning and development phases for large projects as well as for ongoing management activities. Some councils are very proactive in their use of the database. |
| Public awareness of the database | At a general level. |
| Database strengths. |
|
| Database limitations. |
What are the Current and Emerging Uses of the Database for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/baseline. | The database identifies past earthquakes |
| Assisting with determining current state/baseline. | N/A |
| Assisting with modeling possible future outcomes. | N/A |
| Risk assessment. | The database can be used to estimate earthquake and fault rupture hazard. This information can be used to modify infrastructure development. |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design. | N/A |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally or nationally. | N/A |