List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
Database Title |
10.3 BioWeb - Weeds |
|---|---|
| Keywords Type1. Type 11. |
Weeds; distribution, naturalised plants, protected area Weed attributes |
| Abstract | This database is designed to be used by Department of Conservation weed managers. It includes for each weed species in the database: attribute information, the control techniques available, distribution, references and contact people. |
| Geographical Coverage | New Zealand |
| Dataset start date. | January 2000 |
| Dataset end date. | Current |
| Status/currency. | In progress |
| Update frequency. | New entries continually added by authorised staff |
| Maintenance. | There is a data administrator to maintain data quality. |
Technical Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Parameters- what is measured | The following parameters are recorded for each weed species:
The following is recorded for each weed observation:
The following are recorded for each weed control techniques for each species:
The following are recorded in relation to weed management:
Searches can be by strategy area, conservation unit, ecological district; Searches for surveillance efforts can be by area office or weed species. |
| Parameters- what is calculated | N/A |
| Methods used to measure parameters | Species data is from Landcare Research. Other staff will enter weed distribution
information and records on weed control operations and their effectiveness. Data entries will be verified to maintain quality. |
| Secondary sources of data | Published and unpublished material |
| Scale of use. | N/A |
| Number of records | Initially the database will address the existing 2067 naturalised plant species in New Zealand. In future it will also include potential weed species. There are likely to be many observation records per species. |
| GIS compatibility. | Yes |
| Available formats for users. | Electronic database. Ad hoc reports can be prepared using a variety of data. |
| Access constraints. | Initially the database is for Department of Conservation use only. In future aspects of the database will be available to other users under specific arrangements. |
| Measurement Accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Completeness of dataset | To be completed by database manager. |
| Positional accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Database steward | Department of Conservation |
| Database custodian | Department of Conservation |
| Database custodian contact person | Clayson Howell |
| Database custodian Contact Address Phone Fax |
P.O. Box 10 420 Wellington +64 4 471 0726 +64 4 471 3279 chowell@doc.govt.nz |
| References | |
| Date metadata record prepared. | October 1999. Updated December 2001 |
| Author of metadata record. | Victoria Froude |
Management Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Original purpose. | To support the Department of Conservation's weed management activities. |
| Relationships with classification systems. | Apart from the use of species taxonomic classification the main classification system used is Atkinson's vegetation classification system to classify vegetation communities in sites where weed observations are made. |
| Relationships with other databases | The database links to and shares a common format with other subapplications in the Department of Conservation BioWeb database. |
| Known relationships with proposed EPIP indicators. | N/A |
| Who uses this database? | Department of Conservation staff involved with weed management. |
| Public awareness of the database | Low |
| Database strengths. |
|
| Database limitations. |
|
What are the Current and Emerging Uses of the Database for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/baseline. | It is intended that historic data will be entered into the database (e.g. information from Herbarium records and old species lists). |
| Assisting with determining current state/baseline. | The database will provide information on current weed extent and condition. This data will not necessarily be comprehensive as there has been no systematic survey to collect such data. |
| Assisting with modeling possible future outcomes. | The database may assist with predicting future spread of some weed species. |
| Risk assessment. | The database is likely to include a weediness scoring system that will provide an identification of risk. It is likely that weed control techniques will be ranked based on their efficacy and environmental friendliness |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design. | The database could assist to identify sites for monitoring particular weed species. |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally or nationally. | The database can be queried in a number of ways to provide different reporting options. |