List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
Database Title |
9.4 Ornithological Society of New Zealand Monitoring Schemes |
|---|---|
| Keywords Type1. Type 11. |
Terrestrial, freshwater, coastal environment, islands, lakes, estuaries, birds, distribution, abundance |
| Abstract | The Ornithological Society of New Zealand has a number of monitoring
programmes including:
|
| Geographical Coverage | New Zealand |
| Dataset start date. | Various |
| Dataset end date. | Current |
| Status/currency. | In progress |
| Update frequency. | Varies depending on the monitoring programme. |
| Maintenance. | Unspecified. |
Technical Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Parameters- what is measured |
|
| Parameters- what is calculated | N/A |
| Methods used to measure parameters | A variety of standard methods. |
| Secondary sources of data | N/A |
| Scale of use. | Variable. |
| Number of records | Unknown. |
| GIS compatibility. | Unknown. |
| Available formats for users. | Paper database. |
| Access constraints. | Not yet determined. |
| Measurement Accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Completeness of dataset | To be completed by database manager. |
| Positional accuracy | To be completed by database manager. |
| Database steward | OSNZ |
| Database custodian | OSNZ |
| Database custodian contact person | Chris Robertson President |
| Database custodian Contact Address Phone |
25 Weld Street Wadestown Wellington +64 4 472 8173 100244.1012@compuserve.com |
| References | |
| Date metadata record prepared. | October 1999. Updated December 2000. |
| Author of metadata record. | Victoria Froude |
Management Evaluation |
|
|---|---|
| Original purpose. |
|
| Relationships with classification systems. | N/A |
| Relationships with other databases | There are links with other OSNZ databases:
|
| Known relationships with proposed EPIP indicators. | N/A |
| Who uses this database? | This is not yet in the public domain. Some information from existing monitoring programmes has been collated and published in scientific journals including the Society's publication Notornis. |
| Public awareness of the database | The database is not yet in the public domain. |
| Database strengths. |
|
| Database limitations. | The database is not likely to be an electronic database.; There is likely to be limited funding to design and maintain the database. |
What are the Current and Emerging Uses of the Database for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/baseline. | There are a number of historic records of bird distribution and absolute/relative abundance of particular species in certain locations. |
| Assisting with determining current state/baseline. | There are a number of current records of bird distribution and absolute/relative abundance of particular species in certain locations. The Beach Patrol data can identify trends in seabird populations, and provide timing of population declines. |
| Assisting with modeling possible future outcomes. | - |
| Risk assessment. | The database may identify species/populations at risk. The Beach Patrol data can identify trends in seabird populations, and provide timing of population declines. |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design. | The database could identify sites for monitoring relative and absolute abundance of certain bird species. |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally or nationally. | The database primarily collates information from different monitoring programmes. Unless a more systematic sampling programme is implemented as planned it would not be appropriate to aggregate data from specific programmes. |