List of all metadata reports |  This report's TOC |  Previous Page |  Next Page

System Title

4.2 Land Systems

Keywords land systems; geology; lithology; tectonics; climate; biota; characteristic assemblage  
Description Land Systems units are derived by expert opinion, using information on:
  • geology (rock type/lithology and volcanic history)
  • tectonics
  • climate
  • biota

The basic assumption is that similar geology together with tectonics and climate will give rise to a characteristic assemblage of landforms and soils resulting in a typical pattern of natural vegetation.

These landscape patterns are identified as land systems units. Their boundaries are depicted (mapped) by hand.

Status The concept of depicting land systems was developed in Australia in c.1940's, although in 1927 work on the soils of the South Island led to the identification of 'soil sets' which provide a land system style of identifying units of land.

In 1994 Ian Lynn and Len Basher of Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research published a paper 'Principles underlying land systems in resource assessment of hill and mountain lands in New Zealand'.

Lucas Associates together with Ian Lynn of Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research have since prepared land system classifications for 5 territorial authorities and 2 regional councils.

(See geographical coverage below).

Jurisdiction Specific to client agencies.
Contact person/position& Address Di Lucas

Lucas Associates
Marokapara
351 Manchester Street
Otautahi
Christchurch
Email: di@lucas-associates.co.nz

Ian Lynn.
Soil Scientist, Geomorphologist

Manaaki Whenua Landcare
Research
P O Box 69
Lincoln 8152
Phone +64 3 325 6700
Facsimile + 64 325 2418
Email: LynnI@landcare.cri.nz

Available format The systems are depicted by hand. The boundaries may then be digitised onto GIS to produce digital and hard copy maps. Arc/Info GIS software.
Access Agencies can contract Lucas Associates to develop a Land Systems classification for their geographical area of interest. Access will depend upon contract specifications.
Geographical coverage As at August 1999 the following areas had been described using Land Systems:
  • Waimakariri Basin
  • Canterbury Region
  • Queenstown Lakes District
  • Hurunui District
  • Selwyn District
  • Waitakere City
  • Waitomo District
  • Marlborough District
  • Christchurch City
  • Environment Bay of Plenty

 

Operational Specifications

 
Scale of Operation Land systems can be delineated at a range of scales. For example:
  • Regional and district land maps at 1:500 000 and 1:250 000;
  • Maps at 1:50 000, 1:250 00 and 1:10 000 for specific areas of particular interest;
  • 1:100 000 as a basis for plan work.
Contributing databases are better in some areas than in others. For most of New Zealand there is only basic data at 1:250 000.
GIS Compatibility Yes - where digitized
Relationship between levels in the classification system No hierarchy
Contributing databases/classification systems Information on:
  • geology
  • relief (altitude range)
  • drainage
  • soils
  • climate (temperature, rainfall and exposure)
  • maritime influence
  • indigenous vegetation and fauna
  • Land Cover Database
Contributing database GIS compatibility

Provided data sets are geo-referenced then the data can be incorporated into GIS. Whether or not this has occurred is area specific.

Relationship with other classification systems and spatial frameworks. Ecological Regions/Districts are sometimes draped over the Land Systems and used to depict consistent boundaries where appropriate.

See Environment Bay of Plenty Framework For Monitoring Ecological Integrity.

Relationship with other databases

N/A

 

Current and emerging use for:

 
Assisting with determining historic state/ baseline Indigenous Vegetation:
  • Queenstown Lakes
  • Christchurch City
  • Waitakere City
  • Marlborough District
  • Environment Bay of Plenty.
Assisting with determining current state/ baseline Landscape:
  • Waimakariri Basin
  • Canterbury Region
  • Hurunui District
  • Selwyn District
  • Waitomo District
  • Marlborough District
  • Environment Bay of Plenty
Indigenous Vegetation:
  • Environment Bay of Plenty
  • Queenstown Lakes.
Asssisting with scenario building and modelling of possible futures No
Risk Assesment Unknown
Monitoring site selection and sample design Possible - needs investigation  
Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally and/or nationally Can report for the area classified but the depiction of Land Systems relies on expert opinion. This implies it could be difficult to achieve a nationally consistent framework.

Current use (who,level,why)

Landscape identification to provide a basis for communication and guidance about land management:

Input into district plans:

Guiding restoration planting and educating and informing people as to what naturally belongs:

Monitoring framework for ecological integrity:

Decision making on resource consent applications.

User friendliness/public and decision maker understanding

System strengths

Current limitations of system

References

Lucas Associates. 1995. Indigenous Ecosystems an Ecological Plan Structure for the Lakes District. A report to the Queenstown Lakes District Council;

Lucas Associates. Marlborough Sounds Land & Marine Ecosystems

Lucas Associates. Indigenous Ecosystems of Otautahi Christchurch

Lucas Associates & Meurk, C. 1996. Streamside Planting. Guidelines for native planting alongside streams in Christchurch

Lucas Associates, Lynn, I. & Wildland Consultants Ltd. 1998. A Framework for Monitoring Ecological Integrity in the Bay of Plenty Region

Hall, A., Ngapo, N., Parkes, E. & Pemberton, G. 1998. Sustainable Land Management in the Bay of Plenty Region: Proposed Framework for Monitoring Soil Intactness and Soil Health. Environment Bay of Plenty Operations Report 98/11 December 1998.