List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
System Title |
5.14 De Lange & Norton Classification of Uncommon Plants |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Threatened taxa, taxa status, classification, endangered, vulnerable, declining, naturally uncommon, range restricted. |
| Description | This system modifies the IUCN system for classifying threatened taxa. It focuses on addressing two problem areas with the IUCN system:
The system has been developed to address the classification of threatened plants. The authors consider that it could easily be extended to other taxonomic groups. Key features of the system are that it:
|
| Status | The system was published in a 1998 publication by the Royal Society of New Zealand. |
| Organisation | Department of Conservation |
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Contact person/position | Peter de Lange Scientist |
| Address | Science, Technology and Information Services Or |
| Available format | Published papers |
| Access | Freely available |
| Geographical coverage | New Zealand |
Operational Specifications |
|
|---|---|
| Original Purpose. | To develop a classification system for threatened plants in New Zealand that better addresses the naturally uncommon species problem. |
| Scale of Operation | It operates at the national level. |
| GIS Compatibility | N/A |
| Relationship between levels in the classification system | N/A |
| Contributing databases/ classification systems | N/A |
| Contributing database GIS compatibility | N/A |
| Relationship with other classification systems and spatial frameworks. |
|
| Relationship with other databases | N/A |
Current and emerging use for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/ baseline | The historic status of the species needs to be known at a general level to allow the classification system to work properly. |
| Assisting with determining current state/ baseline | The classification system identifies the current state of particular taxa. |
| Asssisting with scenario building and modelling of possible futures | Trends over time in the status of particular taxa may be able to be used to model possible future scenarios. |
| Risk Assesment | The classification system identifies species at risk and attempts to identify the degree of risk |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design | N/A |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally and/or nationally | Data is collected at the national level. |
Current use (who,level,why)
This classification system has been further developed to produce the New Zealand Threat Classification. This later system is being used by the Department of Conservation to classify the threat status of New Zealand plant and animal species.
User friendliness/public and decision maker understanding
A number of the IUCN categories are retained. The names for the categories in the revised de Lange & Norton system are reasonably self explanatory.
System strengths
- It is simple and logical.
- It recognises that not all uncommon species are threatened species
- It provides for taxa that are still nationally widespread but in serious decline
Current limitations of the system
- The system has been developed for plants in terrestrial environments. It may not work as well with other taxonomic groups in other environments.
- Not all categories are directly internationally comparable.
References
De Lange, P.J.; Norton,D.A. 1998. Revisiting rarity: a potential perspective on the meanings of rarity and the classification of New Zealand's uncommon plants. Pp145-160 In: Ecosystems, Entomology and Plants. Royal Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Series, No 48.