List of all metadata reports | This report's TOC | Previous Page | Next Page
System Title |
4.3 Bio-climatic Zones (e.g. Meurk) |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Bioclimatic zones; biogeography; temperature, moisture; vegetation |
| Description | This system defines a broad set of biogeographic zones defined primarily on temperature, and secondly on moisture balance. The zones correspond with potential vegetation boundaries. Existing vegetation boundaries are not used because, while they loosely reflect contemporary climate, other factors can significantly modify the current distribution of vegetation. These factors include: climate history; chance establishment; genetic potential of local species; terrain instability; intrazonal soils and biotic disturbance. This system adapts the continental focus of the international literature on bioclimatic zones to the oceanic islands of New Zealand. Changes are needed to reflect the greater humidity, cloudiness and windiness of oceanic climates. Some New Zealand applications of bioclimatic zones have used species indicative of particular climatic conditions (usually temperature) or altitude to define the zones at a local or regional level. |
| Original Purpose | To facilitate valid global comparisons for ecological data. |
| Status |
The New Zealand application of bioclimatic zones has developed through an iterative process. Meurk's paper was produced in 1984. |
| Organisation | Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research |
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Address | Box 69 Lincoln Phone +64 3 325 6700 Fax +64 3 325 2418 Email: MeurkC@landcare.cri.nz |
| Available format | Published paper |
| Access | Freely available |
| Geographical coverage | New Zealand |
Operational Specifications |
|
|---|---|
| Scale of Operation | Broad scale greater than 1:250,000 |
| GIS Compatibility | Yes |
| Relationship between levels in the classification system | No hierarchy |
| Contributing databases/ classification systems | The original version by Meurk uses: 1. Mean temperature of the warmest month. |
| Contributing database GIS compatibility | N/A |
| Relationship with other classification systems and spatial frameworks. | Often used in association with other frameworks (e.g. ecological regions and districts) and various ecological unit classification systems (e.g. Atkinson's vegetation classification system). A modified form is part of the ecological classification system for the PNA Programme. |
| Relationship with other databases | N/A |
Current and emerging use for: |
|
|---|---|
| Assisting with determining historic state/ baseline | At a broad scale for terrestrial biodiversity. |
| Assisting with determining current state/ baseline | At a broad scale for terrestrial biodiversity. |
| Asssisting with scenario building and modelling of possible futures | At a broad scale for terrestrial biodiversity. |
| Risk Assesment | Limited |
| Monitoring site selection and sample design | Useful for terrestrial biodiversity; could be useful for land. |
| Aggregating and reporting data locally, regionally and/or nationally | Could be possible at a broad scale for terrestrial biodiversity provided that the basis for determining bioclimatic zones in each region/district is the same/directly comparable. |
Current use (who,level,why)
Bioclimatic zones are used in a variety of ecological surveys throughout New Zealand. They are often used in association with other frameworks and/or ecological unit classification systems. Mapping is usually at a broad scale.
User friendliness/public and decision maker understanding
The concept of bioclimatic zones is easy to understand and the names of the zones are self explanatory.
Framework Strengths
- simple system with self explanatory names for the zones
- provides internationally comparable data
- useful for stratifying data/information
Current limitations of framework
- The system uses surrogates for more complex variables. If real data is available then this system becomes redundant.
- There appears to be variation in the local application of bioclimatic zones. This may limit opportunities for comparison of data from different regions/districts.
References
Meurk,C.D. 1984. Bioclimatic zones for the Antipodes and beyond? New Zealand Journal of Ecology 7: 175-181.