Archived publication
This publication is no longer current or has been superseded.
Table 14: Costs and benefits of Policy 8
Return to the point in the document where this table is located.
Stakeholder |
Costs |
Benefits |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Central government |
Local government |
Agricultural sector |
Tourism sector |
Other industry |
General public |
Tangata whenua |
Recreational users |
||
|
Economic |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experience of regulation shared, and regulation improved over time at district and regional level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative results could influence investment in certain regions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater community involvement in resource management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater transparency to the community in terms of the success of water management programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative results may have an impact on recreational values (eg, by excluding some areas from use for various reasons) |
|
|
Environmental |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparing results region by region may not be scientifically robust or fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved environmental results from sharing examples of successful regulation and non-regulatory methods |
|
Cultural |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some iwi or hapū groups may not wish to have information on the Treaty relationship between local government and iwi made public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater tangata whenua involvement in decision-making |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangata whenua input to decision-making will be more measurable |
