Archived publication
This publication is no longer current or has been superseded.
Table 13: Costs and benefits of Policy 7
Return to the point in the document where this table is located.
Stakeholder |
Costs |
Benefits |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Central government |
Local government |
Agricultural sector |
Tourism sector |
Other industry |
General public |
Tangata whenua |
Recreational users |
||
|
Economic |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of other methods (alteration of planning provisions and actual costs, eg, fencing, riparian planting, education programmes, development contribution policy) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of other methods, such as care programmes, may provide sponsorship and advertising opportunities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced costs to those receiving funding and/or support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced costs to ratepayers subsidising development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possibility of increased financial or development contributions for some developments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flow-on economic/employment effects of increased financial/development contributions |
|
|
Social |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education and increased awareness of the importance of water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods may encourage local interest and actions towards freshwater management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased amenity values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved recreation opportunities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased opportunities for use of fresh water as a food source (mahinga kai) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The potential for increased cost of urban development and flow-on affordability issues for housing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possibility of public opposition to increases in development/financial contributions |
|
|
Environmental |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved water quality and quantity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved freshwater environment and surrounds |
