Archived publication

This publication is no longer current or has been superseded.

Table 12: Costs and benefits of Policy 6

Return to the point in the document where this table is located.

Stakeholder

Costs

Benefits

Central government

Local government

Agricultural sector

Tourism sector

Other industry

General public

Tangata whenua

Recreational users

 

Economic

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

 

Increased costs of infrastructure and mitigation measures in order to meet industry best practice standards

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

??

Tick.

 

 

 

Costs of developing or deciding on best practice guidelines in each industry

 

 

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

 

Opportunities for investment in and development of industry best practice techniques, mitigation measures, improved infrastructure/technologies and guidelines

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

 

Potential increased consenting cost of new consents, and costs of reviewing existing consents

 

 

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

 

Potentially reduced productivity/economic activity

 

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

 

Increased monitoring and reporting costs

 

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

 

Potentially increased enforcement costs

 

 

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

The potential for reduced economic activity and therefore employment opportunities within some sectors

Employment opportunities relating to the development of industry good practice techniques, mitigation measures, improved infrastructure/technologies and guidelines

 

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

 

 

More certainty (of feasibility) for developers/ users regarding resource consents

 

Social

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

Increased awareness of the importance of water

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

Education and increased awareness of industry best practice

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

Health benefits of improved fresh water

 

 

 

Tick.

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

Increased amenity values

 

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Potential requirement for people to change existing cultural/social practices

 

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

Tick.

Tick.

 

 

Potential of increased cost of urban development and affordability issues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tick.

 

Improved recreation opportunities

 

Environmental

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

Improved water quality and quantity through use of best practice

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

Improvement of freshwater ecosystems

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Possibility that stringent standards may result in avoidance of the consenting process, and non-compliance with statutory documents

 

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

 

More efficient consumption of fresh water