Return to the point in the document where this table is located.
Stakeholder |
Costs |
Benefits |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Central government |
Local government |
Agricultural sector |
Tourism sector |
Other industry |
General public |
Tangata whenua |
Recreational users |
||
|
Economic |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation guidance (MfE, MAF, DoC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identification of outstanding/degraded freshwater resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amending planning provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation of waterway protection measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential loss of productive land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance and enhancement of clean green image |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced treatment costs for drinking-water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased investment certainty for land and water users |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunities for investment in and development of mitigation technologies |
|
Social |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased contact recreation opportunities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved angling and boating opportunities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential of increased cost of urban development and affordability issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential loss of employment from reduced economic activity |
|
| Environmental | |||||||||
| Improved bio-physical characteristics of fresh water | |||||||||
| Improved aquatic ecosystems | |||||||||
| Improvement to catchment and regional-scale ecosystems | |||||||||
| Cultural | |||||||||
| Improved recognition of Māori cultural values associated with fresh water | |||||||||
| Increased opportunities for the use of fresh waters as a food source (mahinga kai) | |||||||||
| Potential requirement for people to change their existing cultural practices | |||||||||
| Increased use and revival of matauranga Māori | |||||||||
| Increased connection to the land and waterways | |||||||||
| Part of meeting the responsibilities of kaitiaki | |||||||||
| Increased recognition of the value of fresh water to New Zealanders | |||||||||