The proposed national policy statement sets out objectives and policies for transmission. Once the NPS is in place, these objectives and policies will be given effect to by district and regional councils.
NES stand alone, so it is not necessary to have an NPS to support an NES. However, in the case of electricity transmission, the NPS and the NES will work together to provide a consistent framework for managing electricity transmission. The NES will set out a framework of permitted activities and consent requirements, and matters to be considered in assessing consent applications. The NPS will provide a framework of objectives and policies, which will be used by local authorities in making decisions on consent applications under the NES, and for decisions on approvals for constructing new lines and other matters not covered by the NES.
In general, an NES overrides a rule in a plan. A rule in a plan:
There is no requirement for councils to change their plans to accommodate NES. Rules in plans that differ from the proposed transmission activities standards, or are more lenient than the transmission risks standards, will simply no longer apply.
For the proposed transmission activities NES, rules in plans that cover the same activities cannot be more lenient and will not be able to be more stringent than an NES. The permitted activities listed in the NES will be subject to terms and conditions. However, plans can deal with terms and conditions not covered in the NES. For example, if a standard permits painting of towers, then a plan could specify the colour for towers to be painted.
For the proposed transmission risks NES, rules in plans will be able to be more stringent than the NES, because the NES will stipulate this. They cannot be more lenient. This allows for specific local issues to be taken into account. For example, the NES may control excavation of more than 750 mm in depth within 5 metres of a transmission pole, to avoid destabilising the pole. A regional plan that deals with land disturbance may contain more stringent rules about excavations in erosion-prone areas to deal with this specific local issue.
The rights to continue existing uses of land in section 10 of the RMA (see section 2.3) also apply to an NES. However, if an activity was not lawfully established (eg, if it was established in violation of NZECP 34) then it cannot claim existing-use rights. Activities carried out in violation of NZECP 34 would need to be rectified through action under the Electricity Act. Standards under the RMA cannot be applied retrospectively to correct violations under another Act.
Existing-use rights only apply if there is no change in the nature, scale and intensity of the land use. Existing-use rights do not apply to subdivision consents, but may apply to buildings.
2 However, a use that was lawfully established by way of a designation before the standard was made but has lapsed is not required to comply with the NES if the effects of the use, in character, intensity and scale, are the same as or similar to those that existed before the NES was made, provided the use itself did not lapse.