Skip to main content.

Resource Management Act

Key Facts About Local Authorities and RMA Processes in 2007/2008

About the RMA survey of local authorities

Every two years the Ministry for the Environment carries out the Resource Management Act (RMA) survey of local authorities in New Zealand. The survey includes questions about key aspects of RMA implementation:

  • the numbers and types of resource consent applications processed
  • the time taken to process resource consent applications
  • charges to applicants for resource consent applications
  • good practice in resource consent processing
  • monitoring, compliance, complaints and enforcement
  • Māori participation in RMA processes
  • the numbers and types of plan changes and variations.

The purpose of the survey is to:

  • help the Minister for the Environment monitor how the RMA is being put into practice
  • highlight trends over time in implementation of the RMA, as well as areas where performance by local authorities may require greater attention
  • promote good practice under the RMA and improve local authorities’ performance
  • enable each local authority to compare its performance with others
  • provide local authorities with information so they can more accurately respond to enquiries about RMA processes.

This brochure highlights the key facts on RMA processes for the 2007/2008 financial year for the 84 local authorities that responded to the survey. The full report on the Resource Management Act: Two-yearly Survey of Local Authorities 2007/2008 can be found on the Ministry for the Environment’s website at: www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/rma/annual-survey.

Five key facts from 2007/2008

  • 51,960 resource consent applications were processed through to a decision.
  • 0.74 per cent (385) of resource consent applications were declined.
  • 4.7 per cent (2409) of resource consent applications were publicly notified.
  • 1.9 per cent (975) of resource consent applications were notified to affected parties only (limited notification).
  • 69 per cent of resource consent applications were processed on time.

Resource consent application processing

  • 51,960 resource consent applications were processed through to a decision.
  • 4.7 per cent (2409) of resource consent applications were publicly notified.
  • 1.9 per cent (975) of resource consent applications were notified to affected parties only (limited notification).
  • Local authority officers acting under delegated authority made 85 per cent of decisions on resource consent applications.
  • 0.74 per cent (385) of resource consent applications were declined.
  • 1.4 per cent (722) of resource consent decisions were appealed.

Resource consent applications processed, by notification and consent type

Notification type Subdivision Land use Coastal Water Discharge Total
Notified 353 711 271 680 394 2,409
Limited notified 166 515 69 71 154 975
Non-notified 11,263 30,212 972 2,063 3,994 48,504
 Total  11,782  31,438  1,312  2,814  4,542  51,888

Source: 2007/2008 RMA survey data.

Note: This table excludes some data from the one local authority that did not differentiate between notified and limited notified resource consent applications.

Resource consent applications processed on time

  • Overall, 69 per cent of resource consent applications were processed on time.
  • 52 per cent of notified resource consent applications were processed on time.
  • 57 per cent of limited notified resource consent applications were processed on time.
  • 70 per cent of non-notified resource consent applications were processed on time.
  • Section 37 was used to extend the time limits for 28 per cent of all resource consent applications.

Percentage of resource consent applications processed on time, by consent type

Percentage of resource consent applications processed on time, by consent type

Source: 2007/2008 RMA survey data.

Charges for resource consent applications

Average charges to applicants for resource consent application processing varied depending on the type of notification and issuing authority.

Average charges to applicants for resource consent applications

Average charges to applicants for resource consent applications

Source: 2007/2008 RMA survey data.

Good practice by local authorities

The results of the RMA survey are used to highlight and monitor the use of good practice by local authorities to improve performance in resource management functions.

  • 90 per cent of local authorities provided applicants with a checklist defining the environmental effects that must be addressed in resource consent applications for controlled and restricted discretionary activities.
  • 76 per cent of local authorities followed a structured process to identify and address environmental effects.
  • 65 per cent of local authorities had internal notes or checklists to guide staff on when to notify a resource consent application.
  • 62 per cent of local authorities had internal guidance notes or checklists to help staff identify potentially affected parties.
  • 99 per cent of local authorities monitored whether resource consent applications are processed on time.
  • 85 per cent of local authorities formally monitored and reported on their resource consent application processing performance, the results of which are made available to ratepayers.

Monitoring, compliance, complaints and enforcement

  • 79 per cent of resource consents that required monitoring were monitored.
  • 84 per cent of monitored resource consents complied with their conditions.
  • 161,257 complaints about alleged breaches of the RMA were received.
  • 54 per cent of complaints were resolved by formal enforcement methods.
  • 44 per cent of breaches of resource consent conditions were resolved by formal enforcement methods.
  • 1530 infringement notices were issued.

Percentage of local authorities monitoring and reporting on their responsibilities

Responsibility

Regional councils

Unitary authorities

Territorial authorities

All

State of the environment Monitor 100% 80% 42% 53%
Report 100% 80% 30% 43%
Suitability and effectiveness of policies and plans Monitor 100% 60% 64% 69%
Report 75% 20% 35% 40%
Delegated/transferred functions Monitor 73% 20% 44% 46%
Report 55% 0% 29% 30%
Compliance with resource consent conditions Monitor 100% 80% 97% 96%
Report 100% 80% 47% 57%
Complaints register Monitor 100% 80% 91% 92%
Report 100% 80% 53% 61%

Source: 2007/2008 RMA survey data.

Māori participation in RMA processes

  • 88 per cent of local authorities had standard resource consent conditions covering the discovery of sites or items significant to iwi/hapū.
  • 24 per cent of local authorities involved iwi/hapū in resource consent monitoring.
  • 56 per cent of local authorities made a budgetary commitment to iwi/hapū participation in RMA processes.
  • 60 per cent of local authorities had written criteria or a set policy for staff to determine when iwi/hapū should be considered an affected party to resource consent applications.
  • 30 per cent of local authorities had a policy requiring a cultural impact assessment as part of the resource consent application when a site, species or resource is of concern to iwi/hapū.
  • 57 per cent of local authorities had formal memoranda of understanding, protocols, joint management agreements or service-level agreements with iwi/hapū, and 63 per cent had informal agreements.

Plan changes and variations

  • 176 council initiated and 41 privately initiated plan changes to operative district or regional plans were completed.
  • 35 variations to proposed district or regional plans were completed.

Resource consent applications processed by individual local authorities

Local authorities are grouped according to their authority type and, in the case of the 68 territorial authorities, the volume of resource consent applications they process.

Resource consent applications processed by local authorities and the percentage processed on time

Group

Local authority

Number of resource consent applications processed

Percentage processed on time

Territorial authorities group 1 Carterton District Council 106 42%
Gore District Council 75 81%
Kaikoura District Council 87 75%
Kawerau District Council 18 72%
Mackenzie District Council 97 76%
Opotiki District Council 75 89%
Otorohanga District Council 92 78%
Rangitikei District Council Not provided Not provided
Stratford District Council 93 100%
Tararua District Council 107 93%
Waimate District Council 70 41%
Wairoa District Council 62 77%
Waitomo District Council 62 95%
Territorial authorities group 2 Buller District Council 130 100%
Central Hawke’s Bay District Council 150 79%
Clutha District Council 133 75%
Grey District Council 161 69%
Hauraki District Council 185 68%
Hurunui District Council 258 83%
Kaipara District Council 271 79%
Manawatu District Council 294 97%
Masterton District Council 234 71%
Matamata−Piako District Council 281 99%
Ruapehu District Council 171 80%
South Taranaki District Council 272 94%
South Waikato District Council 112 56%
South Wairarapa District Council 238 90%
Upper Hutt City Council 291 76%
Waitaki District Council 157 99%
Wanganui District Council 249 69%
Westland District Council 183 30%
Whakatane District Council 287 45%
Territorial authorities group 3 Ashburton District Council 310 70%
Central Otago District Council 519 72%
Far North District Council 609 37%
Franklin District Council 395 90%
Hastings District Council 632 81%
Horowhenua District Council 332 60%
Hutt City Council 597 83%
Invercargill City Council 345 81%
Kapiti Coast District Council 317 99%
Napier City Council 339 88%
New Plymouth District Council 532 94%
Palmerston North City Council 344 93%
Papakura District Council 306 74%
Porirua City Council 331 82%
Rotorua District Council 564 95%
Selwyn District Council 494 62%
Southland District Council 395 53%
Taupo District Council 399 92%
Thames−Coromandel District Council 562 78%
Timaru District Council 368 54%
Waimakariri District Council 596 82%
Waipa District Council 603 98%
Western Bay of Plenty District Council 431 99%
Whangarei District Council 487 66%
Territorial authorities group 4 Auckland City Council 5,434 45%
Christchurch City Council 2,535 67%
Dunedin City Council 1,010 57%
Hamilton City Council 669 99%
Manukau City Council 1,397 35%
North Shore City Council 2,120 67%
Queenstown−Lakes District Council 1,246 76%
Rodney District Council 1,503 84%
Tauranga City Council 677 82%
Waikato District Council 721 65%
Waitakere City Council 1,491 77%
Wellington City Council 1,051 73%
Regional councils Auckland Regional Council 1,162 87%
Environment Bay of Plenty 1,200 74%
Environment Canterbury 3,373 29%
Environment Southland 868 74%
Environment Waikato 1,216 81%
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council 671 96%
Horizons Regional Council 334 74%
Northland Regional Council 904 99%
Otago Regional Council 734 67%
Taranaki Regional Council 401 100%
Wellington Regional Council 703 99%
West Coast Regional Council 662 93%
Unitary authorities Chatham Islands Council 4 100%
Gisborne District Council 525 50%
Marlborough District Council 1,934 53%
Nelson City Council 472 57%
Tasman District Council 1,135 90%

Source: 2007/2008 RMA survey data.

Note: The percentages for resource consent applications processed within time limits should be interpreted with caution. A resource consent application may be processed outside of the time limit at the request of the applicant, and in this situation does not reflect any inefficiency on the part of the local authority.

Next survey

The next Resource Management Act survey of local authorities will cover the 2010/2011 financial year. The survey questionnaire will be released to local authorities before 30 June 2010 and responses will be collected after 30 June 2011.