Archived publication
This publication is no longer current or has been superseded.
Figure 1: Farmer compliance with resource consent and regional plan requirements during the 2005/2006 season
Return to the point in the document where this figure is located.
Text description of figure
Region |
Total Compliance |
Significant |
Increase, decrease or minimal change (<2%) in compliance from 2004/2005 season |
|---|---|---|---|
Northland |
45% |
28% |
Increase |
Auckland |
78% |
3% |
Decrease |
Bay of Plenty |
68% |
8% |
N/A* |
Waikato |
43% |
23% |
Minimal |
Taranaki |
94% |
0% |
Minimal |
Hawke's Bay |
59% |
7% |
Decrease |
Horizons |
85% |
11% |
Minimal |
Wellington |
64% |
19% |
Decrease |
Tasman |
63% |
1.5% |
Increase |
Marlborough |
87% |
3% |
Increase |
Canterbury |
48% |
19% |
Decrease |
Otago |
98% |
2% |
Minimal |
Southland |
41% |
16% |
Decrease |
*Data not available for 2004/2005 season |
|
||
Return to the point in the document where this figure is located.
