A telephone survey of domestic heating methods and fuels for Ashburton was carried out by Digipoll in January 2005. This involved surveying 150 households within the 2001 census area unit (CAU) areas of Allenton, Central Ashburton West, Netherby, Central Ashburton East, Hampstead and Tinwald.
Survey details are shown in Table 20.1. The number of households for 2004 was estimated based on 2001 census data for occupied dwellings, extrapolated for 2004 based on Statistics New Zealand population projections. [New Zealand Statistics 2004, www.stats.govt.nz] The latter suggests a population decrease for Ashburton of 2% by 2021. [High, medium and low population projections were estimated by Statistics New Zealand. The value used is the medium population projection.]
The Digipoll survey was used to collect information on home heating methods and fuels for Ashburton. These data were collected for the purpose of evaluating the impact of variations in heating methods on air quality in Ashburton, in particular the extent of change required to achieve the national environmental standard for PM10. This section presents the results of the home heating survey for Ashburton largely in tabular form, in the expectation that these results will be of value in other assessments (eg, emission inventory studies).
Tables 20.2 and 20.3 show domestic heating methods and fuels used for main living areas in Ashburton houses, and seasonal variations in heating behaviour. The commonest methods of heating the main living area in Ashburton were electricity (61%) and wood burners (47%). Many households used more than one method of heating in their main living area.
Table 20.3 shows that around 3% of households using gas and 1% of households using wood burners heat their homes during January and February in Ashburton. A larger proportion (10% and 7% of these households) heat their houses during November. The quantities of fuel used per day during non-winter months was typically less than during the winter (Table 20.4). Data are not presented for all heating methods because there was a high non-response rate for questions relating to seasonal variations for some heating types.
In addition to collecting data for the purpose of evaluating the impact of variations in heating methods on air quality, information was collected on a number of variables relevant to the Ministry for the Environment's Warm Homes Project. Relevant data for Ashburton are presented in this section.
Figure 20.1 shows that the proportion of households using gas systems that are properly flued in Ashburton is around 43%. This compares to a national average of around 24%.
The amount spent on heating for a winter month, by heating method, is shown in Table 20.5. In Ashburton, household heating expenditure ranges from $70 to $110 per month, on average, for different heating methods.
Figure 20.2 shows the average heating costs, home ownership, age of dwelling and number of bedrooms for households in Ashburton. Only a small proportion (14%) of the respondents in Ashburton were living in rental accommodation. This compares with a national average of around 20%.
One factor influencing the amount spent on different heating methods is the ability of households using solid fuel burners to obtain wood free of charge. Figure 20.3 shows that over 50% of the wood used on solid fuel burners in Ashburton is self-collected.


Text description of figure
There are two pie graphs. The first graph shows the distribution of flued and unflued gas heaters. Unflued gas makes up 57% of all gas heating and Flued gas makes up 43%.
The second graph is divided by the age of wood burners. Post-1999 wood burners make up 27%, 1994-99 wood burners make up 25% and the remaining 48% of wood burner are Pre-1994.




Text description of figure
There are four bar graphs.
The first graph sets out the average heating cost per month in winter. Cost per month by heating methods are: electric $103, gas $89, open fire $74, wood burner $85, pellet burner $0, multi-fuel $67 and oil $111.
The second graph sets out heating methods divided by home tenure. For households living in rentals 598 use electric, 80 use gas, 160 use open fire, 199 use wood burners, 0 use pellet burners, 14 use multi-fuel and 0 use oil. For households living in their own house 3032 use electricity, 1157 use gas, 239 use open fires, 2593 use wood burners, 40 use pellet burners, 559 use multi-fuel and 239 use oil.
The third graph sets out the age of a dwelling using a particular method of heating.
The fourth graph sets out particular heating methods by the number of bedrooms.

Text description of figure
This bar graph shows the amount of wood either bought or collected free of charge by three different types of heating.
Those using open fires bought 47% of their fuel, those using wood burners bought 34% of their fuel and those using multi-fuel burners bought 50% of their fuel.
The commonest types of electric heater used in the main living area in Ashburton houses were heat pumps, which were used by 42% of households using electric heating (Table 20.6). A number of houses used more than one type of electric heater in their main living area.
Data on home heating methods, by house ownership, are shown in Table 20.7.
Household insulation types and heating methods are shown in Tables 20.8 and 20.9. Most houses had ceiling insulation and around 50% had wall insulation. Around 21% of houses had at least three types of insulation.
Table 20.10 shows home heating method, by household income. The overall non-response rate was around 32%. This limits the interpretation of these data because there may be an income bias in the non-respondents.
Tables 20.11 and 20.12 show the relationship between heating methods and the age of the dwelling and number of bedrooms, respectively.