Return to the point in the document where this table is located.
| Sector |
Nature of pressure |
Expected direction of change |
Expected onset of change |
Expected extent and duration of change |
Preliminary assessment of policy significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy supply and demand |
Changing freshwater flows and levels for hydroelectricity generation |
Increased pressure |
Immediate |
Waters of local, regional and possibly national significance could be subject to this pressure; likely to continue until at least 2020. |
Moderate–high |
Agriculture |
Water abstraction for irrigation |
Reduced pressure, but some uncertainty |
Early–medium |
Effect of ETS price signal will increase as 2013 nears; mixed changes in land use and farming practice expected, overall effect on water likely to be positive but small and hard to predict. Biofuels obligation not likely to have significant impact on water demand. |
Low–moderate |
Forestry |
Afforestation effects on base flows |
Increased pressure |
Early |
Effects can be locally significant in small to medium rivers and aquifers; will continue for duration of ETS-plus incentives. |
Low |
Transport |
Local water pollution from road runoff |
Decreased pressure |
Early |
Effects likely to be small due to inelasticity of demand for road transport; could be increased pressure in selected transport corridors. |
Low |
Agriculture |
Nutrient and sediment runoff from intensive land use |
Decreased pressure |
Medium |
Effectiveness of ETS-plus expected to increase over time. Significance hard to predict. |
Moderate |
Forestry |
Effects on soil erosion and sediment yield |
Decreased pressure |
Medium |
Erosion control benefits increase as trees grow, especially at canopy closure (~8 years). Will continue for duration of ETS-plus incentives. |
Moderate |
Forestry |
Water quality impacts of harvesting |
Increased pressure |
Distant |
New forests not expected to be harvested for 25–30 years. Effects can be locally significant. |
Low |