The Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) released its Fourth Assessment Report in April 2007. It found that Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global mean sea level.
It concludes that most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.
The IPCC was formed in 1988 to provide reliable scientific advice on climate change. Approximately every six years, it has produced a full assessment of the current state of scientific knowledge on climate change and what it means for us. Its reports provide syntheses of evidence and analyses that have been published either in peer-reviewed scientific journals or in other credible sources. The Fourth Assessment Report involved over 1200 scientific authors and 2500 expert reviewers from more than 130 countries.11
Progress has also been made in understanding the spatial and temporal changes in climate, and we now have a better understanding of the uncertainties. A broader and more robust assessment of the relationship between warming and observed changes to natural systems has been possible.
Headline-making global changes that have been observed are summarised in the IPCC ‘Summary for Policymakers’ from The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I.12 They include:
A more detailed summary of global changes that are known to have occurred can be found on the IPCC website, in the above-cited ‘Summary for Policymakers’, in the full Working Group I report;14 and in the Fourth Assessment Synthesis Report.15
Projections of future climate change are made using computer models of the Earth’s climate. These Global Climate Models16 (GCMs) simulate the effect on the atmosphere and oceans of different possible future scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions. A range of future scenarios are used as we do not know exactly how human-induced greenhouse gas emissions will vary over the coming century, and therefore cannot define exactly how the emissions will translate into climate changes and sea-level rise. Mainly because of this uncertainty projections of changes in temperature, sea-level rise etc, are presented as ranges, rather than a single value.
Key future projections from the Fourth Assessment Report are also summarised in the IPCC ‘Summary for Policymakers’. They include:
A more detailed summary of global projections of future climate change can again be found in the IPCC ‘Summary for Policymakers’ and in the full Working Group I report.17 Details of the potential changes in climate within the New Zealand region are summarised in Box 2.1 and provided in a companion Guidance Manual.18
Box 2.1: Summary of expected climate change in New Zealand |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Confidence level |
|
Temperature |
|
Very confident |
Precipitation |
|
Moderate confidence |
Snow |
|
Confident |
Glaciers |
|
Confident |
Wind |
|
Moderate confidence |
Storms |
|
Low confidence |
Long-term changes or trends in relative sea level in a particular region are typically due to a combination of three main components:19
It is important to note that the IPCC provides projections for the first bullet point above (global mean) and some general guidance on the regional changes only.
Measurements of sea-level changes over the last two centuries have come primarily from long-term data from tide gauges mounted on land. The longest records suggest that the rate of rise of global sea levels began to increase from around the early to mid-1800s after relatively stable sea level in the preceding century. Tide gauges provide measurements of relative sea-level rise. Defining absolute sea-level change from such data is difficult owing to their limited spatial distribution (they are located around continental margins and dominantly in the northern hemisphere), and because of vertical land movements (which are often not accurately quantified).
Tide gauge data have been supplemented since 1993 with satellite altimeter data from the TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1 satellites. These satellites provide a recurring measurement of sea levels along a ground track every 10 days between the latitudes 66ºS to 66ºN.
The Fourth Assessment Report reconfirmed the best estimate rates of 20th-century sea-level rise summarised previously in the Third Assessment Report. Table 2.1 reproduces these estimates from the Fourth Assessment Report. The key advance since the Third Assessment is the ability to now balance the global sea-level ‘budget’, accounting for the various processes that contribute to sea-level rise. At the time of the Third Assessment, there was still a substantial unexplained gap between what was known to be contributing to the linear sea-level rise up to end of last century and the actual measured rise (which was higher).
Table 2.1: Estimated rates of global mean sea-level rise for different periods over the 20th century summarised within the Fourth Assessment Report20
| Period | Mean rate of sea-level rise |
Notes |
|---|---|---|
20th century |
1.7 (1.2 to 2.2) mm/yr |
|
1961–2003 |
1.8 (1.3 to 2.3) mm/yr |
|
1993–2003 |
3.1 (2.4 to 3.8) mm/yr |
Whether this faster rate reflects decadal variability or an increase in the longer-term trend (or both) is unclear. |
There is less certainty yet whether an acceleration in global mean sea-level rise has begun. Using reconstructed global mean sea levels from 1870 to 2004, a small acceleration of sea-level rise of 0.013 ± 0.006 mm per year over the 20th century has been observed.21 If this rate of acceleration remained constant, this factor alone would result in a mean increase in sea level of between 0.28 m and 0.34 m for 1990–2100 (compared with a rise of 0.12–0.22 m if the observed linear rate over the 20th century continued without the acceleration). However, this rate of acceleration is expected to increase (see next section).
In New Zealand, tide gauge records from our four main ports average out to a linear rise in relative mean sea level (with respect to the land surface) of 1.6 mm per year (or 0.16 m per century) over the 20th century22 (Figures 2.1 and 2.2). Up until 1999 (when the last analysis was done), there was no statistically significant long-term acceleration.
Figure 2.1: Annual mean sea-level data from the Port of Auckland(Waitemata Harbour) up to 2005, which represents the longest, most consistent record in New Zealand.

Text description of figure 2.1: Annual mean sea-level data from the Port of Auckland (Waitemata Harbour) from 1899 to 2005, together with sea-level trend lines for Auckland, Wellington and Lyttelton. Over this time of just over 100 years, the relative sea level rise shows an upward trend, with a rise of 0.14 m for Auckland, 0.19 m for Wellington and 0.22 m for Lyttelton.
Note: Trend lines in relative sea-level rise since 1899 were calculated from data measured at
Auckland (1899–1999), Wellington (1899–2001 with gaps), Lyttelton
(1901–2001 with gaps).
Sources: Hannah 2004; Ports of Auckland Ltd unpublished; NIWA unpublished.
These New Zealand rates of rise are relative to the landmass on which the tide gauges are mounted. To extract the absolute sea-level rise for the New Zealand region, information is required on the vertical land rise or subsidence over the term of the record. Quantifying vertical land motion is difficult because:
Figure 2.2: Linear trends in relative sea-level derived from
New
Zealand’s
four long-term port records for data up to 1998
(Dunedin),
2006 (Auckland)
and 2001 (Wellington and Lyttelton)

Text description of figure 2.2: A map of New Zealand showing four sites – Auckland, Wellington, Lyttelton and Dunedin – and the linear trends in relative sea-level derived from long-term port records for each of these ports. Auckland has a sea-level trend of 1.40 mm/yr; Wellington has a sea-level trend of 1.78 mm/yr, with a standard deviation of 0.21; Lyttelton has a sea-level trend of 2.08 mm/yr, with a standard deviation of 0.11 and Dunedin has a sea-level trend of 0.94 mm/yr, with a standard deviation of 0.12. Less weight should be given to the Dunedin trend due to poorer quality benchmark control.
Note: Corrections to mean annual sea level have been made for datum shifts, nodal tides (8.8- and 18.6-year tides) and annual pressure and temperature differences. The lower rate of rise for Dunedin is due to the low quality of the data and poor wharf tability, so less weight is given to this value in deriving the New Zealand average rate of rise.
In the interim, crustal model estimates of regional vertical movements of the land due to isostatic adjustment for New Zealand suggest an average rise of around 0.5 mm per year.25 Adding this to the average relative sea-level rise for New Zealand of 1.6 mm per year suggests the eustatic (or absolute) sea-level rise is around 2.1 mm per year. This is close to the observed global average sea-level rise of 1.7 ± 0.5 mm per year (Table 2.1) over the 20th century.
Within a few more years, there should be sufficient data from the monitoring of ground motion, from a combination of local levelling and a national network of stations tracking the GPS satellites. This will provide a more definitive separation of vertical land motion from absolute sea-level rise. However, the consistency of the trends in relative sea level between the sites (excluding Dunedin, where wharf and reclamation stability is a factor) suggests the differential ground motion between sites, if it exists, will be relatively small.
Sea levels will continue to rise over the 21st century and beyond, primarily because of thermal expansion within the oceans and the loss of ice sheets and glaciers on land.26
The basic range of projected sea-level rise that was estimated in the Fourth Assessment Report is for a rise of 0.18–0.59 m by the decade 2090–2099 (mid-2090s) relative to the average sea level over 1980–1999 (Figure 2.3). This range is based on projections from 17 different global climate models for six different future emission scenarios.
The IPCC developed 40 different future emissions pathways or scenarios (referred to as the ‘SRES scenarios’), which fall into four families (A1, A2, B1, B2). Each family envisages a different future, with different levels of technological development and global economic integration. There are six SRES ‘illustrative’ scenarios, each broadly representative of their ‘family’ and spanning a reasonable range of plausible futures. A more detailed description of these scenarios is contained in Appendix 1 of MfE (2008a).
The ranges for each emission scenario are 5% to 95% intervals characterising the spread of GCM results (bars on the right-hand side of Figure 2.3). However, these projections exclude uncertainties in carbon cycle feedbacks and the possibility of faster-than-expected ice melt from the Greenland and Antarctica Ice Sheets.
The basic set of projections (light blue shading in Figure 2.3) includes sea-level contributions due to ice flow from Greenland and Antarctica remaining at the rates observed for 1993–2003. But it is expected that these rates will increase in the future, particularly if greenhouse gas emissions are not reduced. Consequently, an additional 0.1–0.2 m rise in the upper ranges of the emission scenario projections (dark blue shading) would be expected if these ice sheet contributions were to grow linearly with global temperature change. An even larger contribution from these ice sheets, especially from Greenland, over this century cannot be ruled out.
It is important to note that the range of uncertainty in projections of future sea-level rise is largely related to different future scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions (based on scenarios of different future socio-economic profiles, energy use, transport) and the differences in projections from the various climate models used for each emission scenario. In terms of sea-level rise, all emission scenarios suggest a rise of at least 0.26 m to 0.38 m by the 2090s relative to the average for 1980–1999. However, constraining sea-level rise to within this range will require substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions very soon.
Figure 2.4: Comparison between sea-level rise projections from the Third Assessment Report (grey shading) and the Fourth Assessment Report (light blue shading shows the projection for the 2090s, dark blue shading shows the potential additional contribution from Greenland and Antarctica Ice Sheets if contributions to sea-level rise were to grow linearly with global average temperature change over this century).

Text description of figure 2.4:
A comparison between sea-level rise projections from the Third Assessment Report for the year 2100 (relative to a baseline year of 1990), and the Fourth Assessment Report, for the 2090 decade (relative to a baseline average sea level for 1980–1999).
The projected sea-level rise from the Third Assessment Report fans out to between 0.09 and 0.88 metres, a range of 0.69 metres of sea-level rise, by 2100.
The projected sea-level rise for the 2090s from the Fourth Assessment Report for the 2090s is split into two components. The first component lies between 0.18 and 0.59 metres, a range of 0.41 metres of sea-level rise. The second component includes the potential additional contribution from Greenland and Antarctica Ice Sheets if contributions to sea-level rise were to grow linearly with global average temperature change over this century. This additional 0.20 metres of sea-level rise brings the Fourth Assessment Report estimate for the 2090s up to 0.79 m. So the plot shows there is not much difference between the estimates given by the two reports.
Although expressed differently, the global sea-level rise projections in the Fourth Assessment Report are not all that different from those contained in the Third Assessment Report of 2001. The Third Assessment Report suggested a mean sea-level rise of between 0.09 m and 0.88 m by 2100, relative to 1990 for the full range of emission scenarios and GCM uncertainty (Figure 2.4). Subsequent improvements in the information available on global sea-level changes and land-ice storage gathered by satellites, along with improvements in the computer models used, have resulted in a reduced uncertainty range for the latest projections.
The major differences are in:
The Fourth Assessment Report is not suggesting that the projections for sea-level rise have reduced since publication of the Third Assessment Report.
Figure 2.5: Local sea-level change (m) due to ocean density and circulation change relative to the global average during the 21st century.

Text description of figure 2.5: A computer generated map for the A1B emission scenario of the world showing local sea-level change due to ocean density and circulation change relative to the global average during the 21st century. Positive values indicate greater local sea level change than the global change. It shows a wide variation in sea-level change across the world, with some areas showing negative values, generally around Antarctica, areas around the Arctic showing high positive values, and areas in between generally showing low negative, neutral or low positive values, except for an area of high positive values below and to the left of Africa. The New Zealand region shows an increase in sea level of 0-0.05 metres above the global mean.
Note: Positive values
indicate greater local sea-level
change than the global
change. Values have been
calculated as the difference
between averages for
2080–2099 and 1980–1999, as
an ensemble mean over
16 GCMs forced with the
‘SRES A1B scenario’. tippling
denotes regions where
the magnitude of the multi-
model ensemble mean
divided by the multi-model
standard deviation exceeds
1.0.Source: Figure 10.32 in
IPCC 2007c.
Ocean sub-region departures will occur from the global mean sea level owing to regional variations in thermal expansion rates and changes in oceanic circulation within and across the world’s oceans.
Substantial spatial variation in sea-level rise can be seen in all the global climate models but the geographical patterns between different models are not generally similar in detail. However, more of the GCMs show an increase above the global mean in the New Zealand region, than a decrease.27
Figure 2.5 shows an ensemble mean from 16 GCMs forced with the A1B emission scenario28 which suggests sea-level could be around 0.05 m higher relative to the global mean. However, further work is required to more accurately define the potential magnitude of any regional change around New Zealand relative to the global mean.
Variations in vertical land movements around New Zealand will also influence relative sea-level rise around New Zealand. At a national scale, the sea-level records over the last century suggest that this influence may be relatively small. A system for the continuous measurement of vertical land movements has been in place since around 2002, but its period of operation is too short to allow any firm conclusions to be drawn on long-term regional movements. Approximately five more years of data collection is required. Abrupt tectonic movements that may occur after a major earthquake are not able to be forecast and, therefore, are not considered in planning for sea-level rise.
While vertical landmass movements are not yet definitive, in the end it is relative sea-level rise (as measured directly by stably-mounted sea-level gauges) for a particular region or locality that is of prime importance when considering the coastal impacts of climate change.
Figure 2.6: Sea-level rise beyond 2100 attributable to thermal expansion only (ie, excluding ice melting), calculated by eight climate models to the year 3000 for the A1B emission scenario.

Text description of figure 2.6: This figure shows sea-level rise due to thermal expansion from the year 2000 to 3000, from eight climate models for the A1B emission scenario. At the year 3000, the various climate models show a sea-level rise of: 0.6 m, 0.8 m, 0.9 m, 1.1 m, 1.4 m, 1.4 m, 2.0 m and 2.0 m, respectively.
Note: This scenario assumes that carbon dioxide equivalent concentrations30 rise over this century to 700 ppm before stabilising beyond 2100. Source: Adapted from Figure 10.34 in IPCC 2007c.
Sea level will not stop rising at 2100, but will continue to rise for many centuries into the future. Given the permanence of infrastructure and development of entire subdivisions, consideration will need to be given for timeframes beyond 2100 to address sustainability and inter-generational resource management issues.
Future sea-level rise will consist of both a continued response to past emissions (due to the long lag times in the deep ocean’s heating response to climate warming) and to future emissions (Figure 2.6). This lag response, known as the ‘present future commitment to sea-level rise’, will result in sea levels continuing to rise for many centuries even if emissions were stabilised today. Indeed, sea levels to about 2050 are relatively insensitive to changes in emissions over this timeframe (due to the inherited commitment), but future changes and trends in emissions become increasingly important in determining the magnitude of sea-level rise beyond 2050.27 Figure 2.7 provides some indication of the total amount of sea-level rise that could be expected from thermal expansion (again excluding ice melting) for different levels of future carbon dioxide concentrations at stabilisation.
Stabilisation of future emissions will also play an important role in determining the potential contribution of the two major uncertainties associated with longer-term sea-level rise, that of the Greenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheets. Catastrophic contributions to sea-level rise from collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet or the rapid loss of the Greenland Ice Sheet are not considered likely to occur in the 21st century, based on currently understanding (Box 2.2). However, the occurrence of such catastrophic changes becomes increasingly more likely as greenhouse gas concentrations continue to rise.
Figure 2.7: Commitment to sea-level rise beyond 2100, showing long-term equilibrium global average sea-level rise above pre- industrial levels for a range of different carbon dioxide stabilisation concentrations and assumed time periods for peaking carbon dioxide equivalent emissions.

Text description of figure 2.7: Sea-level rise projections shown as global average sea-level rise above pre-industrial levels at equilibrium from thermal expansion, for six different carbon dioxide stabilisation concentrations and assumed time periods for peaking carbon dioxide equivalent emissions.
At a CO2 equivalent concentration at stabilisation of 445-490 parts per million or ppm with a peaking year for CO2 emissions from 2000-2015, the global average sea-level rise would be 0.40-1.40 metres.
At 490-535 ppm for the years 2000-2020, the global average sea-level rise would be 0.50-1.75 metres.
At 535-590 ppm for the years 2010-2030, the global average sea-level rise would be 0.60-1.80 metres.
At 590-710 ppm for the years 2020-2060, the global average sea-level rise would be 0.60-2.40 metres.
At 710-855 ppm for the years 2050-2080, the global average sea-level rise would be 0.75-2.90 metres.
At 855-1130 ppm for the years 2060-2090, the global average sea-level rise would be 1.0-3.75 metres.
Note: Again, these sea-level rise projections consider thermal expansion only; any contributions particularly from the Greenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheets will be additional to those shown.
Box 2.2: Loss of the Greenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheets and implications for sea-level rise |
|---|
Model simulations and observations indicate that warming in the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere is accelerating the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet, and that increased snowfall due to the intensified hydrological cycle is unable to compensate for this melting. As a consequence, the Greenland Ice Sheet may shrink substantially in the coming centuries. Moreover, results suggest that there is a critical temperature threshold beyond which the Greenland Ice Sheet would be committed to disappearing completely, and that threshold could be crossed in this century. However, the total melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet, which would raise global sea level by about 7 m, is a slow process that could take many hundreds of years to complete. Recent satellite and in situ observations of ice streams behind disintegrating ice shelves highlight some rapid reactions of ice sheet systems. This finding raises new concern about the overall stability of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, its collapse would trigger another 5–6 m of sea-level rise. These ice streams appear buttressed by the shelves in front of them. It is currently unknown whether a reduction or failure of this buttressing of relatively limited areas of the ice sheet could actually trigger a widespread discharge of many ice streams and, hence, a destabilisation of the entire West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Ice sheet models are only beginning to capture such small-scale dynamical processes that involve complicated interactions at the ice/ground interface (eg, friction, lubrication) and at the ocean boundary. Therefore, no quantitative information is available from the current generation of ice sheet models regarding the likelihood or timing of such a trigger. Source: Adapted from: IPCC 2007c: Chapter10, ‘Frequently asked questions’. |
Since the cut-off point for science publications to be considered within the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report process, further scientific papers have been published. These add to the array of information on potential future sea-level rise over this century and beyond. Relevant to the guidance provided in the next section, are recent publications that relate to:
The methodology used in both these studies was based on a relationship between changes in global near-surface temperatures and sea-level between 1880 and this present decade. One half of the dataset was used to derive the relationship with the other half used to verify the predictions based on the relationship. Based on this relationship, and using temperature projections from various GCMs, sea-level rise projections were estimated. The global-average temperature projections out to 2100 used by Rahmstorf are based on IPCC Third Assessment Report GCM results for all six emission scenarios, whereas Horton et al, used global-averaged temperatures from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report GCM results, but for only three emission scenarios (B1, A1B, A1). For these three emission scenarios, sea-level rise projections by Horton et al, are around 0.1m lower than for the corresponding projections estimated by Rahmstorf
Temperature projections used are based on GCM simulations which do not include all processes which may influence future temperature such as carbon-cycle feedbacks. Both studies assume the historical relationship between temperature change and sea-level rise is valid to the end of this century. Implicitly this assumes that the two main components contributing to sea-level rise (thermal expansion and glacier/ice cap losses) continue to contribute in the same relative proportion as they have done since 1880. However, it is likely that ice loss will increasingly dominate over thermal expansion if greenhouse gas concentrations continue to rise particularly with the possibility of non-linear ice dynamics. The approach of using surface temperature projections to estimate future sea-level rise has resulted in substantial scientific discussion; as yet no scientific consensus has been reached over the validity of this methodology.
In its Fourth Assessment Report, the IPCC has found that “Because understanding of some important effects driving sea-level rise is too limited, this report does not assess the likelihood, nor provide a best estimate or an upper bound for sea-level rise”. While there are uncertainties associated with the science around sea-level changes, national and local governments and individuals must continue to make decisions that either implicitly or explicitly make assumptions about what this rise will be over a planning timeframe.
Adopting a risk assessment process is advocated in this Guidance Manual (Chapters 4 and 5): it is a useful approach for incorporating uncertainties such as those associated with future sea-level rise.
This requires a broader consideration of the potential impacts or consequences of sea-level rise on a specific decision or issue. Rather than define a specific climate change scenario or sea-level rise value to be accommodated, it is recommended in this Guidance Manual that the magnitude of sea-level rise accommodated (within any particular issue or decision, where it is a factor), is based on the acceptability of the potential risk. In other words, the decision on what sea-level rise value to accommodate is based on a balanced consideration between:
This is shown conceptually in Figure 2.8.
Where sea-level rise is a potential factor in a decision making process, this Guidance Manual recommends that sea-level rise considerations within such a risk assessment are based on the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report sea-level rise estimates, including consideration of the potential consequences from higher sea-levels due to factors not included in the current global climate models.33
To provide some guidance on this assessment process, this Guidance Manual recommends for planning and decision timeframes out to the 2090s (2090–2099):
1. a base value sea-level rise of 0.5 m relative to the 1980–1999 average34 should be used, along with
2. an assessment of the potential consequences from a range of possible higher sea-level rises (particularly where impacts are likely to have high consequence or where additional future adaptation options are limited). At the very least, all assessments should consider the consequences of a mean sea-level rise of at least 0.8 m relative to the 1980–1999 average. Guidance is provided in Table 2.2 to assist this assessment.
For longer planning and decision timeframes where, as a result of the particular decision, future adaptation options will be limited, an allowance for sea-level rise of 10 mm per year beyond 2100 is recommended (in addition to the above recommendation).
Table 2.2: Summary of sea-level rise projections and contributions, uncertainties and recent (2007–2008) science publications to guide the risk assessment process
Sea-level rise factors |
Projected sea level rise by 2090s |
|---|---|
IPCC Fourth Assessment: Model projected sea level rise based on six emission scenarios and accounting for:
|
0.18–0.59 m |
IPCC Fourth Assessment: Consideration of additional contributions to the above:
|
|
Consideration of additional contributions / recent science in defining the potential full range of sea level:
Increased evidence of Antarctic losing mass faster than considered in IPCC (eg, Rignot et al 2008; Shepherd and Wingham 2007)
Rahmstorf (2007) based on GCM TAR simulations of all six emission scenarios |
|
Table 2.3 summarise these baseline sea-level rise recommendations to guide the risk assessment processes for shorter planning and decision timeframes over this century.
Table 2.3: Baseline sea-level rise recommendations for different future timeframes
Timeframe |
Base sea-level rise allowance (m relative to 1980–1999 average) |
Also consider the consequences of sea-level rise of at least: (m relative to 1980–1999 average) |
|---|---|---|
| 2030–2039 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
| 2040–2049 | 0.20 | 0.27 |
| 2050–2059 | 0.25 | 0.36 |
| 2060–2069 | 0.31 | 0.45 |
| 2070–2079 | 0.37 | 0.55 |
| 2080–2089 | 0.44 | 0.66 |
| 2090–2099 | 0.50 | 0.80 |
| Beyond 2100 | 10 mm/year | |
Since the Third Assessment Report (2001), there has been little progress, both globally and in New Zealand, in understanding the effects that climate change is having, and will have, on the other drivers of coastal hazards such as tides, storms, waves, swell and coastal sediment supply. Some indicative guidance on the possible effects on these drivers is provided below.
FS 4, 5
Deep ocean tides will not be directly affected by climate change. However, tidal ranges (and the timing of high and low water) in shallow harbours, river mouths and estuaries could be altered by changes in channel depth. These changes could occur through either the deepening of channels where sea-level rise exceeds the rate of sediment build-up, or conversely by the formation of shallower channels where rates of sediment build-up (from increased run-off due to more intense rainfall events) exceeds sea-level rise.
Further, around the New Zealand coast, the relative frequency of high tides that exceed a given land level will change depending on the relative magnitude of tide range around New Zealand (Box 2.3). Problems will be exacerbated for coastlines with smaller tidal ranges in proportion to sea-level rise, where high tides will more often exceed current upper-tide levels, thus allowing more opportunity to coincide with storms or large swell.35 For the central east coast and Cook Strait / Wellington areas, this means that sea-level rise will have a greater influence on storm inundation and rates of coastal erosion than it will on coastal regions with relatively larger tidal ranges (eg, west coast).
In a planning context, the present-day level of Mean High Water Spring (ie, the jurisdictional boundary) will be exceeded much more frequently by high tides in the future on sections of the coast where the tidal range is lower, than on sections where the tidal range is higher.
FS 1, 2, 4, 7, 10
Changes in storm conditions will affect coastal margins around New Zealand through possible changes in the frequency and magnitude of storm surges and storm tides, and in swell and wave conditions (see next sections). Whilst it is expected that the intensity of severe storms may increase, there remains uncertainty associated with how future climate change will influence the frequency, intensity and tracking of tropical cyclones (in the Pacific tropics), ex-tropical cyclones (which track down to the temperate regions such as New Zealand), extra-tropical cyclones (generated in the mid-Tasman) and low-latitude storms.
The Fourth Assessment Report36 summarised the present knowledge of future changes to tropical and extra-tropical cyclone conditions, where there is confidence in the direction of the projected change based on current scientific evidence (Table 2.4).
Table 2.4: Current known changes in global future tropical and extra-tropical cyclone conditions
| Change in phenomena | Projected change |
|---|---|
Tropical cyclones: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extra-tropical cyclones: |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Adapted from Table 11.2 in IPCC 2007c.
Global climate models are presently most suited for considering changes in large-scale dynamics of the atmosphere–ocean system. Hence, there is a reasonable level of confidence that atmospheric pressure gradients during winter will increase over the South Island, implying an increase in the mean westerly wind component of flows across New Zealand expected by 2090s. Climate model downscaling to New Zealand shows this shift in bias to winds more often coming from a westerly direction but overall increased wind speeds in all directions may not change significantly.37 However, in general the spatial resolution of GCMs is less suited to assessing variability in more transient phenomena such as intense storms, although progress is being made in addressing such issues.
The limited assessment of changes in tropical cyclone behaviour in the Southwest Pacific, provides no clear picture of changes in frequency and tracking, but indicates increases in intensity. Because El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) fluctuations have a strong bearing on tropical cyclone behaviour, uncertainties associated with climate change impacts on ENSO compound the uncertainties associated with changes in tropical cyclones.
FS 4, 7
From the viewpoint of coastal flood and erosion hazards, any change in the magnitude or frequency of storm-tide levels is of greater concern than a rise in mean sea level. Storm-tide levels depend on the magnitude and frequency of storm surges and the timing of the storm surge with high tides.
At a global level, there have been few studies of long-term changes in extreme (high) sea levels.38 Most have found considerable variation from year to year associated with periods of increased storminess; there is little evidence (yet) for an increase in storm-tide levels relative to the underlying upward trend in mean sea level.
Changes in storm surge (produced by low barometric pressure and adverse winds) will depend on changes in frequency, intensity and/or tracking of atmospheric low-pressure systems, and occurrence of stronger winds. Changes in the pattern of tracking of low-pressure systems, ex- and extra-tropical cyclones may also have an effect on extreme water levels due to the complex way that they interact with the continental shelf and coastline.
Changes, particularly in intensity, of individual storm conditions are likely. Much less certain is how these changes translate into changes in the magnitude or frequency of storm surges, and hence how storm-tide levels will change. Until further research and monitoring suggests otherwise, it is assumed that storm-tide levels will rise at the same rate as mean sea-level rise.
Recommendation: Assume that storm-tide (ie, extreme) levels will rise at the same rate as the rise of mean sea level – until more certainty emerges on likely changes to wind and central pressures associated with storm systems.
FS 11
FS 10
Changes in wind and atmospheric pressure patterns, in storms and in cyclones around New Zealand and the wider Southwest Pacific and Southern Ocean regions also have the potential to change the wave climate experienced around New Zealand. Changes in wave climate (mean and extreme wave heights and prevailing directions) can influence the occurrence of coastal inundation though wave run-up and overtopping of coastal barriers, and can significantly influence the patterns and rates of coastal erosion.
In harbour and estuary locations protected from conditions associated with open-ocean swell waves, changes in the occurrence and magnitude of wave conditions will be directly related to changing wind climate over New Zealand and, in shallow-water locations, increases in sea levels. Such changes will be highly localised and will require specific studies to quantify the changes in wave climate. For example, modelling of the wave climate of the city frontage of Wellington Harbour suggested that an increase in wave height of up to 15% was possible by 2050 and up to approximately 30% by 2100.39
On open-coast locations, changes in the swell wave climate (ie, wave conditions generated within the wider South Pacific and Southern Oceans) will dominate.
FS 12
Regional models of deep-water wave climate of the Southwest Pacific40 have shown that waters off New Zealand have a correlation with the Southern Oscillation Index. In general, there is a slight increase in the average wave heights affecting the southern half of the South Island during El Niño phases; on the northeastern coast of the North Island, slightly larger wave conditions occur during La Niña phases. With an increasing westerly wind component, wave climates experienced presently during El Niño phases may provide an indication of general wave climates in the future. However, future wave climate will also depend on changes in storm conditions in the Southwest Pacific and Southern Ocean that generate swell on New Zealand coasts.
Given the lack of present knowledge of how such phenomena (especially swell) may change, little guidance can be given on how wave climate may change and what this may mean for coastal erosion and inundation – other than through specific investigations that include ‘what if’ scenarios that are consistent with some of the general results from GCMs (Box 2.4). Such an approach may provide an indication of the sensitivity of wave climate to potential changes but will certainly not be definitive.
Type of environment: |
Recommendations for 2050–2100: |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS 1
The effects of climate change will also influence both the episodic and mean annual supply of sediment via rivers and streams to the coast. Fluvial sources contribute much of the present-day sediment to many parts of the New Zealand coast.
In some situations, climate change could lead to more sediment delivery. For example, changes in rainfall, and increases in rainfall intensities, will increase the potential for soil erosion from catchments – including the potential for landslips – and also alter the run-off and river sediment transport capacity. Others changes could lead to less sediment delivery – for example, the likelihood of more droughts in eastern areas (apart from rivers draining the main divide in Canterbury). Hence, the potential for change will vary with location around New Zealand, with changes in the west–east gradient in rainfall (wetter in the west and drier in the east) likely to be a significant factor along with increased rainfall intensities during severe rain storms.
Assessing changes in sediment supply and what it may mean for specific coastal regions will rely on detailed specific investigations. For example, studies42 in the Bay of Plenty region estimated that a projected future annual rainfall between a 15% decrease to a 2% increase43 would result in a 25% reduction to a 3% increase in average annual sediment supply from rivers (Box 2.4). However, for the Bay of Plenty, this change was relatively small compared to large interannual variability in sediment yield, which could vary by over a factor of ten.
Box 2.4: Effects of climate change on mean wave conditions in the Bay of Plenty |
|---|
Example using a scenario-based approach to assess the potential effects of climate change on wave conditions in the Bay of Plenty based on adjusting wave hindcast data (in a number of different ways) to account for plausible climate change effects. The figure shows root-mean-square (RMS) breaking wave height along the coast of the Bay of Plenty. Values for the existing climate are plotted in the lower panel in colour-scaled form. The top panel shows changes in values of breaking wave height relative to the present climate for the different assumptions used, which included changes in local winds over New Zealand (red line) and two possible scenarios of changes in swell and local winds (blue and green lines). While the changes in the average (RMS) breaking wave height look relatively small, the compounding effect on other processes such as wave set-up and run-up was significant, especially for adverse storms (see Box 3.1). Crosses in the colour-scaled plot are longshore distance tick marks for every 50 km. |
Source: Bell et al 2006; Acknowledgement: Environment Bay of Plenty.
11 Adapted from NIWA and the Royal Society of New Zealand 2008.
12 IPCC 2007a.
13 ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion.
14 IPCC 2007a, 2007c.
15 IPCC 2007e.
16 Also known as ‘Global Circulation Models’ or ‘Atmosphere–Ocean Global Circulation Models’ (AOGCMs).
17 IPCC 2007a, 2007c.
18 MfE 2008a.
19 Nicholls and Lowe 2004.
20 IPCC 2007c: Chapter 5.
21 Church and White 2006.
22 Hannah 2004.
23 Bell et al 2006.
24 www.geonet.org.nz/resources/gps (23 April 2008).
25 Hannah 2004.
26 IPCC 2007c: Chapter 10.
27 Gregory et al 2001.
28 IPCC 2007c: Chapter 10.
29 Nicholls and Lowe 2005.
30 Carbon dioxide equivalent concentration is used to compare the effect from various greenhouse gases. It is the concentration of CO2 that would cause the same amount of radiative forcing as a given mixture of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. Source: IPCC 2007a.
31 For example Rignot et al 2008; Shepherd and Wingham 2007; Bamber et al 2007.
32 Rahmstorf 2007; Horton et al 2008.
33 Such factors not included in the GCM models relate to uncertainties associated with increased contribution from the Greenland and Antarctica ice sheets, carbon cycle feedbacks, and possible differences in mean sea level when comparing the New Zealand region with the global average.
34 Assuming an average rate of mean sea-level rise of 1.6 mm/yr, sea levels have risen on average by about 27 mm between the midpoint (1990) of the 1980–1999 IPCC reference timeframe and 2007. This should be accounted for when using recent observed sea level measurements.
35 Bell 2007.
36 IPCC 2007c: Chapter 11.
37 MfE 2008a.
38 IPCC 2007c: Section 5.5.2.6.
39 Gorman et al 2006.
40 Gorman et al 2003.
41 This means an increase in frequency of winds from the westerly sector but not necessarily changes in wind speed.
42 Bell et al 2006.
43 Based on MfE 2004.