Return to the point in the document where this flow chart is located.

| Assessment Tool | Priority | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Complaint records | High | Complaints should be classified as validated by a council officer, or from wind-direction records, or as simply registered but not confirmed. Assess how proposed changes will reduce level of complaint. |
| Industry/council experience | High | Experiences of the industry or regional council with this or other similar discharges. |
| Community consultation | High | Periodic meetings with community representatives from community associations. Look for anecdotal evidence of community feeling about odour effects. |
| Olfactometry and modelling of odour sources | High | Use results of complaints analysis, community consultation, and any surveys or diaries to identify the scale of problem, then use modelling to assess the effect of proposed plant changes. |
| Odour annoyance survey | High | Urban and semi-urban areas. Assess against percent at-least annoyed criterion. Assess how the proposed changes will reduce level of annoyance. |
| Meteorology and terrain assessment | Moderate to high | Use to assess potential for downwind adverse effects as a result of poor dispersion around terrain features or in particular meteorological conditions. |
| Odour diaries | Moderate | Isolated areas with low population densities. Assess the frequency, duration, and strength of odour impact events and associated experiences over six months, or a longer time period if necessary, to encompass a specific season. Assess how the proposed changes will reduce level of annoyance. |
| Review of emission control system(s) | Moderate | Look for compliance with best practicable option (BPO), or industry codes of practice. |
| Assessment Tool | Priority | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Complaint records | High | Have any complaints been attributed to acute events? Assess how proposed changes will affect plant performance. |
| Industry/council experience and records | High | As for chronic effects. |
| Community consultation | High | As for chronic effects. Assess how the proposed changes will affect plant performance. |
| Review of odour management plan and contingency procedures | High | What is the level of acceptable risk for uncontrolled odour discharges? Consider high-probability/low-impact events, and low-probability/high-impact events. Is BPO being utilised? Assess how the proposed changes will affect plant performance. |
| Olfactometry and modelling of odour sources | Low | Not recommended as an assessment tool for occasional or periodic releases of odour. |
Return to the point in the document where this flow chart is located.