|
Number |
Recommendation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Screening methods Screening methods cannot be used to determine compliance with the NES for air quality or to establish whether an airshed meets the ambient air quality guidelines. They may, however, be used to provide indicative data for other monitoring purposes. A screening method’s level of accuracy and precision must be suitable for the purpose of monitoring (eg, occupational health and safety equipment is not suitable for ambient air quality monitoring). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 |
Hydrogen sulphide The recommended method for hydrogen sulphide is fluorescence monitoring, in accordance with AS3580.4.1–2008, Methods of sampling and analysis of ambient air – Determination of sulphur dioxide – Direct reading instrumental method. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3 |
Lead content of PM10 The recommended method for lead content of PM10 is high-volume gravimetric sampling in accordance with United States Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 – Protection of Environment, Volume 2, Part 50, Appendix J and Appendix G. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4 |
Benzene and 1,3-butadiene The recommended methods for benzene and 1,3-butadiene are: USEPA method TO-1 – Method for the determination of VOCs in ambient air using Tenax® adsorption and gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS) USEPA method TO-14A – Determination of VOCs in air using specially prepared canisters with subsequent analysis by gas chromatography USEPA method TO-15 – Determination of VOCs in air collected in specially prepared canisters and analysed by gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS) USEPA method TO-17 – Determination of VOCs in air using active sampling onto sorbent tubes BS EN 14662-1:2005 – Ambient air quality – Standard method for measurement of benzene concentrations – Pumped sampling followed by thermal desorption and gas chromatography BS EN 14662-2:2005 – Ambient air quality – Standard method for measurement of benzene concentrations – Pumped sampling followed by solvent desorption and gas chromatography BS EN 14662-3:2005 – Ambient air quality – Standard method for measurement of benzene concentrations – Automated pumped sampling with in situ gas chromatography BS EN 14662-4:2005 – Ambient air quality – Standard method for measurement of benzene concentrations – Diffusive sampling followed by thermal desorption and gas chromatography BS EN 14662-5:2005 – Ambient air quality – Standard method for measurement of benzene concentrations – Diffusive sampling followed by solvent desorption and gas chromatography. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5 |
Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde The recommended method for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde is USEPA method TO-11A – Determination of formaldehyde in ambient air using adsorbent cartridge followed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLP). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6 |
Benzo(a)pyrene The recommended methods for BaP are: USEPA method TO-13A – Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in ambient air using gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS) BS EN 15549:2008 – Air quality – Standard method for the measurement of the concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in ambient air. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7 |
Mercury, chromium and arsenic The recommended method for mercury, chromium and arsenic is: PM10 sampling in accordance with 40CFR Part 50, Appendix J, followed by analysis using atomic absorption spectroscopy or an equivalent method. For mercury: BS EN 15852 – Ambient air quality – Standard method for the determination of total gaseous mercury. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8 |
Meteorological monitoring The minimum monitoring required is as follows:
The use of the Cartesian coordinate system is recommended, whereby data is converted to its x and y components. This data can then be accumulated in a vector form. This solves averaging and unweighted direction problems. Results may subsequently be converted to polar coordinates, if required. Desirable measurements are:
Specific siting requirements: Must be free of influence of trees, buildings, structures – should be at least two times the height away from the obstacle, and for wind sensors it should be at least 10 times the height away from obstacles (refer to Part I, sections 5.9.2 and 6.2 of the Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (World Meteorological Organization, 1996; Oke TR, 2006). Required time resolution:
Period of monitoring: For atmospheric modelling and trend analysis, a minimum of one year’s data is recommended. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9 |
Independent accreditation Accreditation of agencies/firms undertaking air quality monitoring by an independent and approved accreditation organisation is strongly recommended. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10 |
Operation of a beta attenuation monitor
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11 |
Operation of a Operation of a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) It is recommended that TEOMs be fitted with a filter dynamics measurement system (FDMS) when monitoring for national standards. Alternatively, TEOMs can be used without the FDMS by using a correction factor that is determined by co-locating the TEOM with a gravimetric monitor for at least one year. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12 |
The importance of filter conditioning Manual methods for particulate monitoring are all based on weighing material collected on a filter. It is therefore important to recognise that the pre- and post-conditioning of the filter and the filter weighing techniques are just as important as the selection and use of the sampling equipment. Most filters will absorb moisture from the atmosphere, so filter weight will vary in accordance with the surrounding humidity. Particulate matter collected on the filters will also behave in the same way. It is therefore essential that the filters be carefully conditioned and weighed under conditions of constant temperature and humidity, both before and after sampling. Detailed procedures for filter handling, conditioning and weighing are given in the relevant standard method specifications. For example, the USEPA recommends that filters be conditioned for at least 24 hours at a humidity between 20 to 45%, ± 5%, and a temperature of 15 to 30°C, ± 3°C (40 CFR Part 50, Appendix J). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
13 |
Representativeness of monitoring The use of existing air quality monitoring data, emissions inventories and atmospheric dispersion modelling is recommended when determining ‘worst’ locations. Regional exposure should also be taken into consideration when determining the ‘worst’ location. Ambient air monitoring should take into account temporal variations in contaminant concentrations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
14 |
Instrument enclosure temperatures The temperature inside instrument enclosures should remain constant (ideally around 25ºC or at any other temperature stated in the instrument’s user manual). Installation of an air-conditioning unit with heat and cool cycles inside instrument enclosures is recommended to prevent variations in temperature. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15 |
Site selection Regional, neighbourhood and compliance sites should follow the Australian / New Zealand standard (AS/NZS 3580.1.1.2007). Peak sites can deviate from the standards when necessary. Whenever site locations do not meet the standard requirement, this should be clearly detailed in the site metadata. A minimum co-location period of one year is recommended when relocating monitoring sites. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
16 |
Monitoring records Agencies operating monitoring instruments need to keep detailed records of visits and maintenance, preferably in electronic form. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
17 |
Calibration Calibrations should be carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications and the requirements of the standard method. Span and zero checks are recommended on a daily basis. Multi-point calibrations should be performed not less than six months apart. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
18 |
Equipment maintenance The routine maintenance and service requirement outlined and recommended by the instrument manufacturer should be followed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
19 |
Calibration and maintenance documentation As a vital part of data quality assurance it is recommended that detailed procedure manuals and schedules for instrument maintenance and calibration be established. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
20 |
Training Air quality monitoring technical staff should be provided with basic training on core air quality monitoring competencies. Another effective method of training and systems improvement is to participate in reciprocal auditing activities between monitoring agencies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
21 |
Data acquisition, storage and data checks The use of an external datalogger is recommended for all instruments to eliminate one source of variation using analogue connections. All data should be stored in a central database that is regularly backed up. It is recommended that daily data checks be done for each telemetered site (or whenever data is downloaded from untelemetered sites), and events noted that may affect results. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
22 |
Data adjustment Data quality assurance should be subsequent to multi-point calibrations for gases and done at least monthly given that the NES for air quality require public reporting of a breach within 30 days of its occurrence. Applying the response curve to raw data can correct gradual changes to baselines but is not recommended when there is a sudden baseline change. A minimum co-location period of one year is recommended before correcting data. A copy of raw data should be archived, and all corrected data should be marked to inform data users. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
23 |
Negative data Negative and positive spikes should be reviewed during the data analysis process to evaluate whether they are real or spurious. Unless there is good evidence to remove a value, it should be left in and a comment made in the metadata. Where negative values are within the expected error of the instrument, they should be retained within the data set to avoid creating a positive bias in the final result. Where large negative spikes are observed in the data record from some particulate monitors, check to see whether a large positive spike is also present. If both a large positive and a large negative spike are present, then remove both spikes as invalid data and check the inlet temperature sensors for faults. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
24 |
Per cent valid data and data capture rate Sites used for compliance monitoring should achieve at least:
Per cent valid data for averaging = number of valid data points obtained Data capture rate = number of valid data points obtained |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25 | Site metadata Documented site metadata should be used when interpreting air quality monitoring results. Metadata should be recorded either in hard copy or in a database. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter |
Explanation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring site metadata |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Indicators/contaminants monitored |
List all the contaminants that have been or are being monitored at the site |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Site code |
Site code specified by monitoring agency |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Site title |
Common name of site; eg, Taihape |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Location |
Street address of site |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Region |
For example, Southland region |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-ordinates |
New Zealand Mapping Series/Grid reference preferable (latitude and longitude optional) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment owner’s name/s |
Name of party/ies who own the equipment at the site |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Land owner’s details |
Name/s and contact information of land owner/s |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment housing |
For example, shed, lab, air conditioning |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Housing environment |
For example, air conditioning at 25oC |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring objectives |
For example, to determine population exposure in high-density areas where air quality is suspected to be poor |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Site topography |
For example, there are hills 1 km to the southwest; to the north are high-rise commercial buildings |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Location and description of major emission sources |
This should include information on the nature, location and distance to predominant sources (eg, roads, factories, domestic fires) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Site category |
See section 6.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Scale of representation |
See section 6.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Site height above sea level |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Electrician and air conditioner service person contact details |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Photographs of the site |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Meteorological site metadata |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Meteorological variables measured |
For example, wind speed, wind direction, temperature at height at which they are measured |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Meteorological data operator |
Person who operates the met station |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Location of meteorological site |
For example, on site up mast 6 m high, at the neighbouring airport |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Meteorological data information |
Where met data can be obtained (eg, met service, regional council) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional and local meteorological characteristics |
A brief description of met conditions likely to affect air quality at the site (eg, inversions, prevailing wind direction) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Contaminant metadata |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Contaminant |
For example, PM10, NO2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Data owner |
Name of organisation that actually owns the data recorded by equipment |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Instrument/s |
Name and any other details of the instrument/s (make, brand, serial number and model). If using more than one instrument, include both in this section |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Period of operation |
Dates when equipment was operated (eg, 12.3.2001 to 8.5.2003 or 11.3.2008 ongoing) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Details of the standard method followed to operate the equipment (eg, USEPA or AS/NZS standard). Also, include details of any deviation from the standard method (eg, conditioning and weighing of filters). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Data logging |
For example, remote via modem, or not used |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Data storage |
Describe how the data is stored by the data owner |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sampling period |
How often the concentration is sampled and measured |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sampling probe height |
Height of probe above ground |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Calibration frequency |
Summarised details of equipment calibration |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Per cent valid data |
Amount of data that has passed quality assurance checks (see Recommendation 24), recorded on a yearly basis (eg, 2005 – 95%; 2006 – 98%; 2007 – 96%) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26 | Monitoring units The recommended units for recording and archiving the monitoring results of gases are parts per million (ppm) or parts per billion (ppb), with conversion to mg/m3 or µg/m3 at 0ºC for reporting purposes. PM10 results should be recorded and archived as µg/m3 at 0ºC. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27 | Time format Times and dates should always be reported in New Zealand Standard Time. Labelling of the midnight hour should be 24.00 instead of 00.00. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28 | Reporting data formats
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29 | Significant digits and rounding-off protocols The recommended data format in section 9.2 specifies the significant digits for the reporting of a contaminant. When the value following the significant digit is equal to or greater than five, the digit should be rounded up; otherwise, the digit is retained. For all monitoring sites, an exceedence occurs when the reported concentration is above the standard, after rounding to the significant digit. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
[ Previous ]