The Tier 1 assessment is a qualitative assessment. The objectives are to compile background information, identify key issues and determine the appropriate level of assessment. It is recommended that a Tier 1 preliminary assessment be undertaken before the first pre-application meeting with the council. The checklist in Appendix 1 may help with this.
The Tier 1 assessment should consider the receiving environment and the nature and scale of the proposal, focusing on the:
scale of the development
nature of the pollutants released to air
adoption of pollution prevention measures
alternatives
complaints/compliance record
existing air quality, including any airshed designation under the Standards
physical geography of the receiving environment
sensitivity of the receiving environment
type of consent required
any relevant objectives, policies or rules in the regional or district plan.
These factors are discussed further below. The level of detail required will vary depending on the proposal.
It is likely that a Tier 1 assessment will be all that is required for a controlled activity in an appropriately zoned area with no highly sensitive receptors located nearby. Discharges to air from these activities are likely to be minimal, and easily controlled by process design and standard operating practices. Adequate dispersion of air emissions should be achievable via appropriately designed discharge points. The potential for off-site human health, environmental or amenity effects would be low.
An assessment for this type of activity should include:
any information that may be required by the relevant regional plan, including evidence that the activity is permitted or controlled
the site location and contact details
a process and site description, including quantities of raw materials and fuels to be used
a description of emissions to air
a description of emission controls and mitigation measures
a description of the receiving environment, including air quality, topography and meteorology
a qualitative description of the potential effects, taking into account the emissions and the receiving environment
a summary of any complaints relating to discharges to air from the site.
The scale of a development may be thought of in terms of throughput of raw materials or output of product compared to similar developments. The assessment should therefore include a description of the activity, including process throughputs and quantities of raw materials to be stored and handled. Typically, the scale of the development determines whether or not consent is needed. Clearly it is more likely that larger-scale complex industry will require a higher level of assessment than smaller-scale activities.
The assessment should include a description of the type and likely quantities of air discharges. This will influence the level of assessment required.
The type of consent sought (ie, controlled, permitted, etc) will influence the level of assessment required. The preliminary assessment should include adequate information to demonstrate that the activity meets any requirements of the relevant regional plan for the type of consent required. The preliminary assessment should also consider whether the proposal may require other resource consents.
The assessment should review the existence and effectiveness of any pollution prevention measures, and whether the measures in place (or proposed) are consistent with best practice for the type of industry being considered. Pollution prevention measures may include:
cleaner production technologies - where waste reduction is a focus of industrial process design and operation so that more benign and fewer raw materials are used, less energy is consumed, and fewer waste materials are released to air, land or water, etc
pollution control equipment (eg, the use of flue gas desulphurisation equipment with a conventional coal- or oil-fired power plant)
the use of appropriately sized stacks to ensure adequate dispersion of emissions to air before a pollutant plume reaches potentially affected receptors
the use of management or operational controls, such as process or emissions monitoring or management plans
the use of buffer zones to separate receptors from industrial emission sources
the provision of offsets.
The best local guidance on what constitutes best practice in terms of emission levels is set out in the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (2002) Protection of Environmental Operations (Clean Air) Regulations. This regulation was amended in 2005 to incorporate emission concentration limits for new plant (ie, Group 6) that reflect contemporary best practice control technology.
Secondary guidance on clean technologies and abatement equipment available to a wide range of industrial sectors is available from the website of the European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau (http://eippcb.jrc.es/). This provides reference documents on the best available techniques under the EU Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive.
Offsets are another potential form of mitigation, whereby emissions from an activity are 'offset' by emission reductions elsewhere in an airshed (see section 5.1.1 for further explanation of offsets). The Updated Users Guide (Ministry for the Environment, 2005) expands on this form of mitigation.
Pollution prevention measures act to prevent and minimise the potential impacts of industrial emissions to air. A well-controlled industrial development, from the perspective of emissions to air, would be expected to require a lower level of assessment and have a greater chance of proceeding than one that is poorly controlled.
The Tier 1 assessment should consider alternatives, including:
alternative locations that may be less sensitive
alternative methods of undertaking the activity (eg, cleaner production)
alternative methods of pollution control that may reduce emissions
whether the discharge could be to another receiving environment (eg, into water rather than air).
For an existing industry applying for consent renewal or expanding in scale, the complaints history will be a relevant factor.
When it comes to air quality, the most frequent complaints are about dust and odour. The Ministry for the Environment provides separate guidance for assessing dust and odour impacts, which should be followed if these have the potential to persist or occur (Ministry for the Environment, 2001a and 2003, respectively). Clearly, where a complaints record indicates there are existing community concerns regarding an air quality issue relevant to an application, a higher level of assessment would be expected.
Similarly, where an existing industrial development is seeking consent for expansion or alteration, the consent condition compliance record should be examined (eg, compliance with stack emission limits). Where compliance has been poor, the engineering design should be improved.
Overall, the level of assessment expected is likely to be higher for an industry with a poor compliance record.
At the time of publication, 69 areas throughout New Zealand have been gazetted as airsheds under the provisions of the Standards. Of these, around 30 are likely to exceed the national ambient air quality standard for PM10 and are therefore subject to controls on the granting of resource consents. It is likely that any industrial development within these airshed areas that shows any significant increase in PM10 emissions will require a Tier 3 assessment. For up-to-date information on airshed designations, contact the appropriate regional council.
Existing air quality is an important consideration in any air quality assessment. The Tier 1 preliminary assessment should determine what information is available (if any) on existing air quality, and how this compares to relevant air quality criteria.
The physical geography of an area can affect the dispersion of pollutants, and is a particularly important consideration in dispersion modelling. The preliminary assessment should identify whether there are any significant topographical features that may affect dispersion.
Features such as coasts and mountainous terrain require more complex predictive modelling techniques than, for example, flat inland sites. These considerations are well covered in the Good Practice Guide for Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling (Ministry for the Environment, 2004a), which is a companion guide to this document. A qualitative consideration is briefly covered in section 5.
The Tier 1 assessment should include a review of the relevant regional and district plans to identify any objectives, policies or rules that should be considered.
Adverse effects on air quality can be exacerbated by the sensitivity of the receiving environment. An assessment of the sensitivity of the receiving environment requires an assessment of land use and the likely sensitivity of the local population to air emissions.
Table 6.1 provides a general classification of the sensitivity of various land uses to discharges of contaminants into air. Because land uses are the key criteria for classifying the sensitivity of the receiving environment, district plan zonings can have a large influence on an area’s sensitivity. Higher-sensitivity land uses will require a higher level of assessment.
Table 6.1: Types of land use/location and the sensitivity of the receiving environment
|
Land use |
Reasons for sensitivity |
Rating |
|---|---|---|
|
Hospitals, schools, childcare facilities, rest homes |
People of high sensitivity (including children, the sick and the elderly) are exposed. People are likely to be exposed continuously (up to 24 hours, seven days a week). |
High |
|
Residential |
People of high sensitivity (including children and the elderly) are exposed. People cherish a stress-free environment at home and have the view that 'my house is my castle'. People may be present all times of the day and night, both indoors and outdoors. Visitors to the area are unfamiliar with any discharges and are more likely to be adversely affected (which can cause embarrassment to residents and raise awareness of the problem). |
High |
|
Open space recreational |
These areas are used for outdoor activities and exercise, in circumstances where people tend to be more aware of the air quality. People of all ages, physical conditions and sensitivity can be present. |
High |
|
Tourist, cultural, conservation |
These areas can have high environmental values, so adverse effects are unlikely to be tolerated. |
High |
|
Commercial, retail, business |
These areas have a similar population density to residential areas as people of all ages and sensitivity can use them. Commercial activities can also be sensitive to other uses (eg, food preparation affected by volatile organic compounds emissions from paint manufacture). There can be embarrassment factors for businesses with clients on their premises. |
Medium to high |
|
Rural residential/ countryside living |
Population density is lower than in residential areas, so the opportunity to be adversely affected is lower. However, people of high sensitivity can still be exposed at all times of the day and night. Often people move into these areas for a healthier lifestyle and can be particularly sensitive to perceived health risks. |
Medium to high |
|
Rural |
A low population density means there is a decreased risk of people being adversely affected. People living in and visiting rural areas generally have a high tolerance for rural activities and their associated effects. Although these people can be desensitised to rural activities, they are still sensitive to other types of activities (eg, industrial activities). |
Low |
|
Heavy industrial |
Adverse amenity effects tend to be tolerated as long as the effects are not severe. Many sources discharge into air, so there is often a mix of effects. People who occupy these areas tend to be adult and in good physical condition, so are more likely to tolerate adverse effects, particularly if the source is associated with their employment. |
Low |
|
Light industrial |
These areas tend to be a mix of small industrial premises and commercial/retail/ food activities. Some activities are incompatible with air quality impacts (such as paint sprayers requiring a dust-free environment), while others will discharge to air. |
Low |
|
Public roads |
Roads users will typically be exposed to adverse effects from industrial sources for only short periods of time. |
Low |
Tier 1 represents the simplest check as to whether a discharge to air might cause adverse effects. The criteria are conservative and provide a simple checklist. If there is any doubt, the assessment should proceed to Tier 2, or be discussed with council officers.