In 2004, the Ministry for the Environment gazetted the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards Relating to Certain Air Pollutants, Dioxins and Other Toxics) Regulations 2004 (Including Amendments 2005) (the regulations). The regulations include five key provisions:
ambient air quality standards for five pollutants
a requirement for regional councils to monitor air quality and report any breaches of the ambient standards to the public
restrictions on the granting of resource consents for industrial emissions in polluted areas
design standards for new wood burners and large landfills
a list of banned activities (to limit emissions of toxic compounds, including dioxins).
Regional councils are responsible for implementing the regulations. Given that 2008 was halfway to the 2013 deadline it was considered timely to review the implementation of the regulations to highlight any risk areas early and to permit time to work with councils towards compliance.
The Ministry undertook the review of regional council implementation of the regulations on a cooperative basis. We:
notified the Chief Executive Environment Forum of our intention to undertake the review in April 2008
discussed the review with all councils through their National Air Quality Working Group (NAQWG) representatives in May 2008,1 and obtained staff input into the review’s design by preparing a review protocol and requesting feedback on this protocol
visited each council in person throughout June, July and August 2008 and conducted interviews with nominated staff with the aim of reviewing all factors that affect implementation (as opposed to focusing simply on compliance)
used the opportunity of visiting each council to share information on best practice and central government assistance programmes
recorded council interviews in draft form initially to permit time for review and further comment; council responses were finalised within two to four weeks of each visit.
In addition, the Ministry carefully structured the review to:
identify any barriers and/or risks to successful implementation of the regulations
provide sufficient context for other factors affecting air quality management (eg, staff resourcing, other council commitments)
recommend, where feasible, how the Ministry can provide assistance and/or leadership towards compliance.
Appendix 1 contains a copy of the review protocol.
A draft report was prepared in September 2008 and posted on the NAQWG website for comment. The draft report was then presented to the NAQWG meeting in November 2008. Council comments were received up to January 2009, and the report was finalised in March 2009.
Council interviews are summarised in appendix 2 and discussed in the remainder of this report. The following section discusses key air quality issues for New Zealand as well as region-specific contextual information relevant to air quality management.
In 2008, New Zealand’s key air quality issue was winter-time pollution in urban areas. This winter-time pollution is due to PM10 (particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter) emissions from solid-fuel domestic combustion (ie, home heating). The New Zealand ambient PM10 standard is 50 micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m3), as measured over 24 hours, with one exceedance permitted per year. Ambient air quality has breached this standard in all regions of New Zealand except three (Gisborne District Council, Horizons Regional Council, and Taranaki Regional Council).
Table 1 summarises the top 10 worst polluted airsheds in New Zealand.
| Ranking | Airshed | Regional council | 2nd highest concentrationb (µg/m3) | Number annual exceedances |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM10 standard = 50 µg/m3 with 1 exceedance permitted per year | ||||
| 1 | Alexandra | Otago | 130 | 46 |
| 2 | Christchurch | Canterbury | 172 | 27 |
| 3 | Nelson | Nelson | 108 | 51 |
| 4 | Timaru | Canterbury | 130 | 36 |
| 5 | Kaiapoi | Canterbury | 145 | 28 |
| 6 | Rotorua | Bay of Plenty | 112 | 24 |
| 7 | Richmond | Tasman | 111 | 21 |
| 8 | Ashburton | Canterbury | 104 | 23 |
| 9 | Tokoroa | Waikato | 83 | 33 |
| 10 | Hastings | Hawke’s Bay | 114 | 18 |
a Ranking is based on data from 2005/06 (with additional data from 2007 where available) and considers both second-highest concentration and maximum number of exceedances. The methodology for ranking was provided to EECA and all regional councils in April 2008.
b The regulations permit 1 exceedance of the PM10 standard each year.
The following regions face unique or special challenges with respect to air quality management that are worth noting:
Auckland, where vehicle emissions are a significant background load factor
Northland, which has the only airshed gazetted for managing sulphur dioxide (Marsden Point airshed), due to the presence of New Zealand’s only oil refinery
Hawke’s Bay, Marlborough, Otago and Tasman, where agricultural burning practices can affect air quality in neighbouring urban areas
Southland and the West Coast, where there is a heavy predominance of multi-fuel burner installations (wood burners are very rare at less than 3 per cent)
Waikato, Otago and Canterbury, which contain a large number of airsheds that are likely to exceed the PM10 standard, although most of these airsheds have relatively small populations.
In addition, at the time this report was being prepared there was a Royal Commission of Inquiry into local governance in Auckland. At that time the Auckland Regional Council reported problems in its relationships with territorial authorities in the region.
1 The National Air Quality Working Group comprises technical staff from all regional councils and unitary authorities, as well as the following central government agencies: Ministry for the Environment, Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Health, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority, New Zealand Transport Agency, and Ministry of Education.