You are here: Info about...
Waste
Landfills
The Guide to Closed
and Closing Landfills ![]()
The recommended approach for evaluating environmental and human health risk related to closed or closing landfills, and for subsequent management decision-making, is as follows.
Additional guidance, or formal requirements may be imposed by regional or district plan rules. Early liaison with council staff is recommended.
Sources of information on closed landfills include Regional Council files, operators, aerial photos, GIS records, topographical maps and geological maps. It is also important to visit the site prior to making any assessment of the potential risks.
Analysis of environmental and human health risk typically follows a tiered approach, ranging from a simple, low cost and conservative guideline comparison to more complex and expensive, but precise, modelling options. At each stage, the results are reviewed and if there is significant uncertainty about the potential for effects further investigations may be required. The questions to be answered include:
Simple guideline criteria such as ANZECC Water Quality Guidelines, NZ Drinking Water Standards and OSH Workplace exposure standards (for landfill gas) can be used in an initial evaluation of risk.
Visit the Landcare Ecological Risk site for an ecological risk evaluation model being developed for New Zealand.
Many management options for closed landfills are very costly. It is important to put landfill-related risks in context, to ensure risk acceptance and spending are compatible with those in comparable infrastructure areas, such as roading and wastewater management.
Because of the range of issues involved in landfill management, risk evaluation should where possible be carried out in a way that allows comparison of risks with different levels of quantification and non-risk issues.
Depending on the amount of data available, this can be done very simply; for example, Yes/No for each element if data is limited or dealing with a single landfill, or by using a number of comparative rating systems for a larger number of sites. Two illustrative examples of comparative rating approaches are included in the guide.
Last updated: 17 September 2007







