Archived publication
This publication is no longer current or has been superseded.
Explanatory Note: Transition to new stock status categories
This report card reports the status of a fish stock compared to target level (usually the biomass needed to produce maximum sustainable yield). In future reporting, we will apply the new Harvest Strategy Standard for New Zealand Fisheries stock status categories, which are available for 2009 data onwards.
The Ministry of Fisheries has completed the first stock assessment using these new categories in their Updated Status of New Zealand’s Fish Stocks.
The percentage of overfished2 stocks compared to target levels has nearly doubled since 2006.
Fishing is the most widespread human activity in the marine environment. New Zealand’s marine environment and fisheries resources are highly valued economically, recreationally, culturally and environmentally. This snapshot report is one of a series that provides information on New Zealand’s fishing activity from an environmental perspective. Total commercial catch and stock status are measured to report on fish stocks under the quota management system (QMS).
As shown in figure 1, there were 453,145 tonnes (t) of fish caught commercially in the 2008 fishing year. Middle-depth fish 3(ie, hoki, hake and ling) made up almost a quarter of this total catch, with 112,513 t caught in 2008 (82 per cent of which was hoki). Inshore finfish 3 (including red cod, snapper and tarakihi) made up almost 20 per cent of the total catch at 85,762 t and deepwater trawl species3 (including orange roughy) made up around 8 per cent of the total catch at 39,279 t.


Read a description of this graph
| Species Group | Middle depth species (hoki, hake, and ling) | Inshore finfish (barracouta, red cod, silver warehou, snapper, and tarakihi ) | Deepwater trawl species (orange roughy, oreo species, rattails, and cardinal fish) | Squid and octopuses | Mackerels (jack mackerels and kahawai | Southern blue whiting/small pelagics (southern blue whiting, pilchards, and mullets) | Sharks, rays and skates | Marine invertebrates (except for squid and octopuses) (scampi, oysters, and scallops) | Highly migratory species (tunas, swordfish, and ray’s bream) | Bottom line species (bluenose, hapuku, bass, ribaldo, and toothfish) | Freshwater species (short-finned and long-finned eels) | Other (miscellaneous species) | Total |
| 1990 | 203140 | 68113 | 53674 | 31821 | 28849 | 9968 | 9220 | 11671 | 9386 | 2309 | 1070 | 2168 | 431389 |
| 1991 | 237439 | 75447 | 60584 | 37852 | 43633 | 39046 | 14046 | 13386 | 10238 | 3810 | 1431 | 4693 | 541605 |
| 1992 | 223159 | 80467 | 67317 | 63482 | 49941 | 71327 | 12569 | 9920 | 5513 | 4099 | 1555 | 3884 | 593233 |
| 1993 | 203433 | 93390 | 66062 | 37259 | 67006 | 37185 | 15034 | 9493 | 5726 | 4894 | 1618 | 4372 | 545472 |
| 1994 | 196259 | 76458 | 66069 | 67942 | 50705 | 15822 | 16655 | 10660 | 10566 | 5007 | 1287 | 4378 | 521808 |
| 1995 | 211957 | 88861 | 62659 | 87017 | 52631 | 23822 | 16493 | 10867 | 9725 | 6218 | 1500 | 6312 | 578062 |
| 1996 | 234698 | 95836 | 66366 | 54539 | 48003 | 13089 | 20129 | 11657 | 12042 | 6287 | 1498 | 3998 | 568142 |
| 1997 | 269548 | 102233 | 59096 | 63796 |
46988 |
17672 |
20446 | 13366 | 11944 | 6602 | 1340 | 4961 | 617992 |
| 1998 | 301768 | 98633 | 51941 | 43197 |
46230 |
31337 |
24103 | 24768 | 16534 | 5828 | 1348 | 6624 | 652311 |
| 1999 | 270070 | 92480 | 56136 | 27401 | 52802 | 46758 | 25277 | 26534 | 12610 | 5931 | 1275 | 6211 | 623485 |
| 2000 | 275167 | 84556 | 54753 | 21000 | 31704 | 30374 | 23196 | 26807 | 19030 | 6241 | 1173 | 5136 | 579137 |
| 2001 | 258964 | 85323 | 48953 | 35608 | 41964 | 27496 | 26617 | 25513 | 14065 | 6348 | 1102 | 4805 | 576758 |
| 2002 | 220714 | 83898 | 52397 | 49018 | 46975 | 42274 | 29829 | 23817 | 13472 | 7092 | 1035 | 7450 | 577971 |
| 2003 | 210035 | 95015 | 47978 | 43923 | 49198 | 30789 | 28991 | 16811 | 16351 | 7108 | 861 | 6803 | 553863 |
| 2004 | 172565 | 94425 | 42160 | 84331 | 47833 | 30848 | 25178 | 16523 | 20800 | 7316 | 754 | 7576 | 550309 |
| 2005 | 139004 | 94402 | 45947 | 86411 | 63003 | 32811 | 22808 | 16467 | 16253 | 7997 | 728 | 6540 | 532371 |
| 2006 | 126261 | 94210 | 45281 | 73136 | 55223 | 18686 | 22076 | 16881 | 12005 | 7172 | 788 | 7238 | 478957 |
| 2007 | 131332 | 97894 | 41898 | 70095 | 50962 | 38216 | 22125 | 15842 | 17914 | 7278 | 752 | 5631 | 499939 |
| 2008 | 112513 | 85762 | 39279 | 56270 | 59584 | 32617 | 21055 | 15725 | 16635 | 6923 | 670 | 6112 | 453145 |
Notes: (1) Catch data is reported by ‘fishing year’, which runs from 1 October to 30 September. A fishing year takes its name from the second of the two calendar years because this is the year in which most of the fishing year lies. (2) Please refer to species groupings for more detailed information.
Data source: Ministry of Fisheries.
Fisheries in New Zealand waters are a common property resource. The Government’s role is to ensure fisheries are not overfished, while balancing the competing demands of user groups.
Commercial fisheries in New Zealand are managed under the quota management system (QMS) where individual transferrable quota for fish stocks are owned by private interests. The quantity of fish that can be taken by commercial fishers, for each stock in a fishing year, is the total allowable commercial catch (TACC).
The commercial fish catch increased from 431,389 t in 1990 to a peak of 652,311 t in 1998 (figure 1). Since then, the annual total catch has generally decreased, to 453,145 t in 2008. These trends are driven mainly by the catch of middle-depth fish (primarily hoki), which accounted for about 40 per cent of total catch in the early to mid-1990s and, on average, over 45 per cent in the peak years between 1998 and 2000. In more recent years, however, middle-depth fish accounted for about 25 per cent of total commercial fish catch.
Inshore finfish catches have remained relatively consistent between 1997 and 2008, whereas catches for deepwater species have decreased, from a peak of 67,317 t in 1992 to 39,279 t in 2008. Figure 1 also shows that annual squid catches fluctuated between 1990 and 2008 with peaks of around 86,000 t in 1995, 2004 and 2005.
Changes in commercial catches may be due to a number of reasons including: biological factors (related to environmental variations), economic factors, changes to fisheries legislation, and/or overfished2 stocks.
New Zealand’s fish stock assessment is the basis for reviewing catch limits for species subject to quota. Safe fishing levels are worked out by determining the largest average annual catch that can be taken over time without decreasing a stock’s productive potential (maximum sustainable yield or MSY).
Working groups estimate the status of each stock, to determine whether current TACCs and actual catch levels are sustainable.
When new information results in substantial changes to previous assessments, a report is referred to the Fishery Assessment Plenary for further consideration and a document is prepared summarising the state of each stock.
From here, economic, social and environmental considerations are taken into account to determine whether TACCs should be adjusted, and if so how quickly. Once adjustments are made the process starts again.
This indicator describes the present status of the stock relative to its target level (usually the biomass needed to produce maximum sustainable yield – BMSY).
The status of New Zealand fish stocks are classified as:
In 2008, 71 per cent of the 101 fish stocks of known status (out of a total of 628 fish stocks), were considered to be not overfished2 compared to target levels (see text box on status classes above) (this includes all stocks in the ‘above target levels’, ‘near or above target levels’, ‘probably near or above target levels’, and ‘possibly near or above target levels’) (figure 2). The remaining 29 per cent of fish stocks of known status were considered to be overfished2 compared to target levels (this includes all stocks ‘below target levels’). In some cases, the Ministry of Fisheries has rebuilding strategies in place for these fish stocks.
Internationally, the term overfished is commonly used to describe fish stocks below target levels. For the purpose of this report, a stock that is overfished is defined as ‘below target level’. Fish populations can be sustainably fished at much lower population sizes than that at maximum sustainable yield (MSY).

Data source: Ministry of Fisheries.
Read a description of this graph
| Fishing year | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Status Classes | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
| Above Target Levels | 12.9 | ||
| Near or Above Target Levels | 22.8 | ||
| Near or Above Target Levels | 51.5 | 44.7 | |
| Probably Near or Above Target Levels | 23.2 | 25.9 | 21.8 |
| Possibly Near or Above Target Levels | 10.1 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Below Target Levels | 15.2 | 15.3 | 28.7 |
In New Zealand’s first state of the environment report in 1997, 10 per cent of the 74 fish stocks of known status were reported as overfished2 compared to target levels. Over the 11 years since this was reported, the percentage of overfished2 stocks has nearly trebled compared to target levels. It is difficult, however, to directly compare these figures as the QMS now has new stocks and sub-stocks and more species are being assessed using improved methodologies.
Since we last reported in 2007, the percentage of overfished2 stocks compared to target levels has nearly doubled, from 15 per cent in 2006 and 2007 to 29 per cent in 20085. Included in the 29 per cent of overfished2 stocks are:
Allowable catch levels have been reduced in all these fisheries to allow them to rebuild to target levels. In the case of west coast snapper and longfin eel fish stocks, issues relating to river and harbour environments may also be impacting on stocks. It is clear from these trends that pressures on our fisheries remain and our fish stocks will continue to need careful management in the future.
In 2006, New Zealand had the 12th highest proportion of world fish catches out of 29 OECD countries (figure 3).

Read a description of this graph
| Country | Proportion of world fish catches |
|---|---|
| 2004-06 | |
| Austria | 0.0004 |
| Switzerland | 0.0016 |
| Slovak Rep. | 0.0018 |
| Czech Rep. | 0.0048 |
| Hungary | 0.0080 |
| Belgium | 0.0265 |
| Greece | 0.1013 |
| Finland | 0.1484 |
| Poland | 0.1751 |
| Australia | 0.2352 |
| Portugal | 0.2358 |
| Ireland | 0.2686 |
| Sweden | 0.2833 |
| Germany | 0.3012 |
| Italy | 0.3203 |
| Netherlands | 0.5365 |
| Turkey | 0.5378 |
| New Zealand | 0.5563 |
| France | 0.6224 |
| UK | 0.6935 |
| Spain | 0.9272 |
| Denmark | 1.0218 |
| Canada | 1.1905 |
| Mexico | 1.3762 |
| Iceland | 1.6830 |
| Korea | 1.7682 |
| Norway | 2.5548 |
| Japan | 4.4837 |
| USA | 5.2402 |
| OECD | 25.3043 |
Between 1995 and 2006, New Zealand had the 12th highest average annual percentage growth in fish landings out of 24 OECD countries (figure 4).

Notes: (1) EU = Member state of the European Union. (2) Changes in fish catch may be due to a number of environmental and non-environmental factors (see trend section on previous page).
Source: OECD Factbook 2009.
Read a description of this graph
| Country | Average annual growth in percentage, 1995-2006 or latest available period |
|---|---|
| Denmark | -7.519 |
| Poland | -5.725 |
| Korea | -5.064 |
| Japan | -4.458 |
| Greece | -4.332 |
| Spain | -4.1165 |
| Iceland | -4.044 |
| United Kingdom | -3.5329 |
| Belgium | -3.321 |
| Sweden | -3.3006 |
| OECD total | -2.6609 |
| Ireland | -2.652 |
| Portugal | -2.606 |
| New Zealand | -2.239 |
| Turkey | -1.4931 |
| Norway | -1.061 |
| United States | -0.8093 |
| Italy | -0.464 |
| Australia | -0.416 |
| Finland | -0.349 |
| France | -0.209 |
| Netherlands | 0.117 |
| Mexico | 0.162 |
| Germany | 0.657 |
| Canada | 2.071 |
Notes:
(1)Trends in commercial fish catch are not necessarily indicative of fish stock abundance.
(2)Internationally, the term overfished is commonly used to describe fish stocks below target levels. For the purpose of this report, a stock that is overfished is defined as ‘below target level’(see text box on status classes). Note: Fish populations can be sustainably fished at much lower population sizes than at maximum sustainable yield (MSY).
(3)Please refer to species groupings for more detailed information.
(4)In 2008, we separated ‘near or above target levels’ in to two separate categories: ‘above target levels’ and ‘near or above target levels’ to provide a more comprehensive and meaningful disaggregation of the data. While we are unable to apply these new categories to previous years’ data, we will continue to use ‘above target levels’ and ‘near or above target levels’ for future reporting.
(5)Stock assessments are not necessarily made up of the same set of stocks and sub-stocks each year.
Last updated: September 2009