Archived publication

This publication is no longer current or has been superseded.

Fishing Activity: Fish Stocks

Explanatory Note: Transition to new stock status categories
This report card reports the status of a fish stock compared to target level (usually the biomass needed to produce maximum sustainable yield). In future reporting, we will apply the new Harvest Strategy Standard for New Zealand Fisheries stock status categories, which are available for 2009 data onwards.

The Ministry of Fisheries has completed the first stock assessment using these new categories in their Updated Status of New Zealand’s Fish Stocks.

Key points

  • 453,145 tonnes (t) of fish were caught commercially in the 2008 fishing year, with hoki making up the largest proportion.
  • Overall, commercial fish catch has reduced in recent years1 through a combination of active management to reduce catches in some stocks and actual declines in abundance of others.
  • In 2008, of the 101 fish stocks of known status, 71 per cent were considered to be not overfished and 29 per cent were considered overfished compared to target levels2.

rating 3The percentage of overfished2 stocks compared to target levels has nearly doubled since 2006.

Introduction

Fishing is the most widespread human activity in the marine environment. New Zealand’s marine environment and fisheries resources are highly valued economically, recreationally, culturally and environmentally. This snapshot report is one of a series that provides information on New Zealand’s fishing activity from an environmental perspective. Total commercial catch and stock status are measured to report on fish stocks under the quota management system (QMS).

Commercial fish catch

Current situation

As shown in figure 1, there were 453,145 tonnes (t) of fish caught commercially in the 2008 fishing year. Middle-depth fish 3(ie, hoki, hake and ling) made up almost a quarter of this total catch, with 112,513 t caught in 2008 (82 per cent of which was hoki). Inshore finfish 3 (including red cod, snapper and tarakihi) made up almost 20 per cent of the total catch at 85,762 t and deepwater trawl species3 (including orange roughy) made up around 8 per cent of the total catch at 39,279 t.

Figure 1
Landed commercial catch by species groups, 1990–2008

Figure 1 Landed commercial catch by species groups, 1990–2008

Figure 1 - figure legend

Species Group Middle depth species (hoki, hake, and ling) Inshore finfish (barracouta, red cod, silver warehou, snapper, and  tarakihi ) Deepwater trawl species (orange roughy, oreo species, rattails, and cardinal fish) Squid and octopuses Mackerels (jack mackerels and kahawai Southern blue whiting/small pelagics (southern blue whiting, pilchards, and mullets) Sharks, rays and skates Marine invertebrates (except for squid and octopuses) (scampi, oysters, and scallops) Highly migratory species (tunas, swordfish, and ray’s bream) Bottom line species (bluenose, hapuku, bass, ribaldo, and toothfish) Freshwater species (short-finned and long-finned eels) Other (miscellaneous species) Total
1990 203140 68113 53674 31821 28849 9968 9220 11671 9386 2309 1070 2168 431389
1991 237439 75447 60584 37852 43633 39046 14046 13386 10238 3810 1431 4693 541605
1992 223159 80467 67317 63482 49941 71327 12569 9920 5513 4099 1555 3884 593233
1993 203433 93390 66062 37259 67006 37185 15034 9493 5726 4894 1618 4372 545472
1994 196259 76458 66069 67942 50705 15822 16655 10660 10566 5007 1287 4378 521808
1995 211957 88861 62659 87017 52631 23822 16493 10867 9725 6218 1500 6312 578062
1996 234698 95836 66366 54539 48003 13089 20129 11657 12042 6287 1498 3998

568142

1997 269548 102233 59096

63796

46988

17672

20446 13366 11944 6602 1340 4961 617992
1998 301768 98633 51941

43197

46230

31337

24103 24768 16534 5828 1348 6624 652311
1999 270070 92480 56136 27401 52802 46758 25277 26534 12610 5931 1275 6211 623485
2000 275167 84556 54753 21000 31704 30374 23196 26807 19030 6241 1173 5136 579137
2001 258964 85323 48953 35608 41964 27496 26617 25513 14065 6348 1102 4805 576758
2002 220714 83898 52397 49018 46975 42274 29829 23817 13472 7092 1035 7450 577971
2003 210035 95015 47978 43923 49198 30789 28991 16811 16351 7108 861 6803 553863
2004 172565 94425 42160 84331 47833 30848 25178 16523 20800 7316 754 7576 550309
2005 139004 94402 45947 86411 63003 32811 22808 16467 16253 7997 728 6540 532371
2006 126261 94210 45281 73136 55223 18686 22076 16881 12005 7172 788 7238 478957
2007 131332 97894 41898 70095 50962 38216 22125 15842 17914 7278 752 5631 499939
2008 112513 85762 39279 56270 59584 32617 21055 15725 16635 6923 670 6112 453145

Notes: (1) Catch data is reported by ‘fishing year’, which runs from 1 October to 30 September. A fishing year takes its name from the second of the two calendar years because this is the year in which most of the fishing year lies. (2) Please refer to species groupings for more detailed information.
Data source: Ministry of Fisheries.

Fisheries management

Fisheries in New Zealand waters are a common property resource. The Government’s role is to ensure fisheries are not overfished, while balancing the competing demands of user groups.
Commercial fisheries in New Zealand are managed under the quota management system (QMS) where individual transferrable quota for fish stocks are owned by private interests. The quantity of fish that can be taken by commercial fishers, for each stock in a fishing year, is the total allowable commercial catch (TACC).

Trend 1

The commercial fish catch increased from 431,389 t in 1990 to a peak of 652,311 t in 1998 (figure 1). Since then, the annual total catch has generally decreased, to 453,145 t in 2008. These trends are driven mainly by the catch of middle-depth fish (primarily hoki), which accounted for about 40 per cent of total catch in the early to mid-1990s and, on average, over 45 per cent in the peak years between 1998 and 2000. In more recent years, however, middle-depth fish accounted for about 25 per cent of total commercial fish catch.

Inshore finfish catches have remained relatively consistent between 1997 and 2008, whereas catches for deepwater species have decreased, from a peak of 67,317 t in 1992 to 39,279 t in 2008. Figure 1 also shows that annual squid catches fluctuated between 1990 and 2008 with peaks of around 86,000 t in 1995, 2004 and 2005.

Changes in commercial catches may be due to a number of reasons including: biological factors (related to environmental variations), economic factors, changes to fisheries legislation, and/or overfished2 stocks.

Status of fish stocks

Assessing stock status

New Zealand’s fish stock assessment is the basis for reviewing catch limits for species subject to quota. Safe fishing levels are worked out by determining the largest average annual catch that can be taken over time without decreasing a stock’s productive potential (maximum sustainable yield or MSY).

Working groups estimate the status of each stock, to determine whether current TACCs and actual catch levels are sustainable.

When new information results in substantial changes to previous assessments, a report is referred to the Fishery Assessment Plenary for further consideration and a document is prepared summarising the state of each stock.

From here, economic, social and environmental considerations are taken into account to determine whether TACCs should be adjusted, and if so how quickly. Once adjustments are made the process starts again.

Status classes

This indicator describes the present status of the stock relative to its target level (usually the biomass needed to produce maximum sustainable yield – BMSY).
The status of New Zealand fish stocks are classified as:

  • above target levels4
  • near or above target levels4
  • probably near or above target levels
  • possibly near or above target levels
  • below target levels.

Current situation

In 2008, 71 per cent of the 101 fish stocks of known status (out of a total of 628 fish stocks), were considered to be not overfished2 compared to target levels (see text box on status classes above) (this includes all stocks in the ‘above target levels’, ‘near or above target levels’, ‘probably near or above target levels’, and ‘possibly near or above target levels’) (figure 2). The remaining 29 per cent of fish stocks of known status were considered to be overfished2 compared to target levels (this includes all stocks ‘below target levels’). In some cases, the Ministry of Fisheries has rebuilding strategies in place for these fish stocks.

Internationally, the term overfished is commonly used to describe fish stocks below target levels. For the purpose of this report, a stock that is overfished is defined as ‘below target level’. Fish populations can be sustainably fished at much lower population sizes than that at maximum sustainable yield (MSY).

Figure 2
Stock status for assessed fish stocks, 2006–20084

Figure 2 Stock status for assessed fish stocks, 2006–2008

Data source: Ministry of Fisheries.

Fishing year
Status Classes 2006 2007 2008
Above Target Levels 12.9
Near or Above Target Levels 22.8
Near or Above Target Levels 51.5 44.7
Probably Near or Above Target Levels 23.2 25.9 21.8
Possibly Near or Above Target Levels 10.1 14.1 13.9
Below Target Levels 15.2 15.3 28.7

Long-term trend

In New Zealand’s first state of the environment report in 1997, 10 per cent of the 74 fish stocks of known status were reported as overfished2 compared to target levels. Over the 11 years since this was reported, the percentage of overfished2 stocks has nearly trebled compared to target levels. It is difficult, however, to directly compare these figures as the QMS now has new stocks and sub-stocks and more species are being assessed using improved methodologies.

Recent trend

Since we last reported in 2007, the percentage of overfished2 stocks compared to target levels has nearly doubled, from 15 per cent in 2006 and 2007 to 29 per cent in 20085. Included in the 29 per cent of overfished2 stocks are:

  • one of the two hoki fish stocks
  • seven of the eight orange roughy fish stocks
  • one of the four oreo fish stocks
  • all four gemfish fish stocks
  • two of the 11 paua fish stocks
  • one of the five snapper fish stocks (west coast North Island)
  • all five bluenose fish stocks
  • four of the five longfin eel fish stocks.

Allowable catch levels have been reduced in all these fisheries to allow them to rebuild to target levels. In the case of west coast snapper and longfin eel fish stocks, issues relating to river and harbour environments may also be impacting on stocks. It is clear from these trends that pressures on our fisheries remain and our fish stocks will continue to need careful management in the future.

International comparison

Current situation

Rating 2

In 2006, New Zealand had the 12th highest proportion of world fish catches out of 29 OECD countries (figure 3).

Figure 3
Proportion of world fish catches

Figure 3 Proportion of world fish catches

Country Proportion of world fish catches
  2004-06
Austria 0.0004
Switzerland 0.0016
Slovak Rep. 0.0018
Czech Rep. 0.0048
Hungary 0.0080
Belgium 0.0265
Greece 0.1013
Finland 0.1484
Poland 0.1751
Australia 0.2352
Portugal 0.2358
Ireland 0.2686
Sweden 0.2833
Germany 0.3012
Italy 0.3203
Netherlands 0.5365
Turkey 0.5378
New Zealand 0.5563
France 0.6224
UK 0.6935
Spain 0.9272
Denmark 1.0218
Canada 1.1905
Mexico 1.3762
Iceland 1.6830
Korea 1.7682
Norway 2.5548
Japan 4.4837
USA 5.2402
OECD 25.3043

Trend1

Rating 2

Between 1995 and 2006, New Zealand had the 12th highest average annual percentage growth in fish landings out of 24 OECD countries (figure 4).

Figure 4
Fish landings in domestic and foreign ports, 1995–2006

Figure 4 Fish landings in domestic and foreign ports, 1995–2006

Notes: (1) EU = Member state of the European Union. (2) Changes in fish catch may be due to a number of environmental and non-environmental factors (see trend section on previous page).
Source: OECD Factbook 2009.

Country Average annual growth in percentage, 1995-2006 or latest available period
Denmark -7.519
Poland -5.725
Korea -5.064
Japan -4.458
Greece -4.332
Spain -4.1165
Iceland -4.044
United Kingdom -3.5329
Belgium -3.321
Sweden -3.3006
OECD total -2.6609
Ireland -2.652
Portugal -2.606
New Zealand -2.239
Turkey -1.4931
Norway -1.061
United States -0.8093
Italy -0.464
Australia -0.416
Finland -0.349
France -0.209
Netherlands 0.117
Mexico 0.162
Germany 0.657
Canada 2.071

Notes:

(1)Trends in commercial fish catch are not necessarily indicative of fish stock abundance.

(2)Internationally, the term overfished is commonly used to describe fish stocks below target levels. For the purpose of this report, a stock that is overfished is defined as ‘below target level’(see text box on status classes). Note: Fish populations can be sustainably fished at much lower population sizes than at maximum sustainable yield (MSY).

(3)Please refer to species groupings for more detailed information.

(4)In 2008, we separated ‘near or above target levels’ in to two separate categories: ‘above target levels’ and ‘near or above target levels’ to provide a more comprehensive and meaningful disaggregation of the data. While we are unable to apply these new categories to previous years’ data, we will continue to use ‘above target levels’ and ‘near or above target levels’ for future reporting.

(5)Stock assessments are not necessarily made up of the same set of stocks and sub-stocks each year.

Last updated: September 2009